Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (Virginia) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,815,114 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($4,150,403). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2023
$0
Funders on record
14
Grants received
$12M
Net assets
$0
6/14 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 30%
01What it does

What International Society for Technology in Education does

Mission

Iste inspires educators worldwide to use technology to innovate teaching and learning, accelerate good practice and solve tough problems in education by providing community, knowledge and the iste standards, a framework for rethinking education and empowering learners.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Iste learning includes publications, online courses, certification programs and consulting services for educators. All programs and services are designed around the iste standards framework.

  2. The iste conference & expo draws 15,000-21,000 attendees and exhibit personnel attendees include educators, technology coordinators, administrators, library media specialists, policy makers, and other education stakeholders activities include planning, promoting, and implementing the event through our corporate relations program we solicit sponsors to help subsidize the cost of this event.

  3. Iste member services offers access to topic focused weekly webinars, the iste professional learning networks, iste conference videos, member discounts on iste books and professional learning courses, and member pricing for the iste conference & expo.

  4. Provide educators with resources to understanding federal and state education resources.

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($17M) Expenses 100 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($9.6M)2018 Revenue 134 ($22M) Expenses 124 ($18M) Net assets 103 ($9.9M)2019 Revenue 136 ($23M) Expenses 137 ($20M) Net assets 127 ($12M)2020 Revenue 102 ($17M) Expenses 108 ($16M) Net assets 149 ($14M)2021 Revenue 81 ($14M) Expenses 97 ($14M) Net assets 143 ($14M)2022 Revenue 122 ($20M) Expenses 139 ($20M) Net assets 125 ($12M)2023 Revenue 0 ($0) Expenses 0 ($0) Net assets 0 ($0)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (0)Expenses (0)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $21M to $0 (−100%).

$14M
$17M
$20M
$22M
$20M
$21M
$0
2017201820192020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2019 0% · 2020 7% · 2021 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.9M
’17
$4.1M
’18
$2.3M
’19
$1.0M
’20
−$807k
’21
−$89k
’22
$0
’23
2.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Richard Culatta

CEO

As listed on its FY2023 Form 990.

2017201820192020202120222023
Listed24202222202015
Joined·+6+8+7+3+8+0
No longer listed·1067585
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $785k → $11.

4 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 35% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

37% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION.

35%
largest funder
83%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 92% · 2019 64% · 2020 47% · 2021 34% · 2022 37% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 7 states in all.

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CA
AR
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $203k on record.

Federal$203k
grants $63kcontracts $141k
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Defense$111k
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration$63k
  • Department of Education$30k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

0% of spending goes to programs.

Program 0%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION?
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (Virginia) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,815,114 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($4,150,403). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION have?
IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $11,815,114 in grants to INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION?
GATES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $4,150,403 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds International Society for Technology in Education →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing