Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $214,917 to it, the largest being JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ($139,467). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Harry C Trexler Estatelocal
- World Learning Incportfolio match
- International Citycounty Management Associationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2022 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
1% of INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $139k → $18k.
From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 65% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES draws 67% of its grant income from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Harry C Trexler EstatelocalPA · funds 116 organizations near you
- World Learning Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Citycounty Management Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Batt Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dt Instituteportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- John Templeton Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jhpiego Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mastercard Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Namaste Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bachman Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Freedom Houseportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $27k on record — $9k federal, $18k state.
- Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency$9k
- Educ & Training For Employees$18k
- Publications And Music$379
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
55% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Part of a family of 2 related entities
- Buxmont Academy · exempt
- Community Service Foundation · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES?
- INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $214,917 to it, the largest being JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ($139,467). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $214,917 in grants to INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES?
- JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY is the largest funder on record, with $139,467 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESTORATIVE PRACTICES find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing