· Public charity
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc
Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $33,545,648 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $71,156,815 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,611,167 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $464k
- $250k+21 grants · $33M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ONE ACRE FUND | $5,833,333 |
| NEW VENTURE FUND | $5,522,990 |
| DASRA | $3,885,900 |
| LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE | $3,100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO ECHO INSTITUTE | $2,146,685 |
| ARMMAN-USA | $2,000,000 |
| NEW VENTURE FUND | $1,693,095 |
| ARROW | $1,050,000 |
| LAST MILE HEALTH | $1,000,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $966,475 |
| ID INSIGHT INC | $894,000 |
| PLANETREAD | $883,386 |
| ASPIRE INDIA INC | $590,000 |
| CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT | $520,896 |
| OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $6.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $38M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SEE PART V
Stated purpose: SEE PART V
Stated purpose: SEE PART V
Stated purpose: SEE PART V
Stated purpose: SEE PART V
Stated purpose: SEE PART V
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OAONE ACRE FUND2× · 2023–2024 · $13M · revenue +1%
- PCPEOPLE'S COURAGE INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2022–2023 · $5.7M · revenue +24% · 62% of their budget
- OGOPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT2× · 2023–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +615% · 64% of their budget
Funded once
- IBINTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2023 · $2.0M
- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -28%
- IBINTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIPone grant, 2023 · $866k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
The fuller project is the global newsroom dedicated to groundbreaking reporting that catalyzes positive change for women.
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Government Partnership Secretariat and the most unlike its peers is Armman-Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COURAGE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds DASRA ↗
- Who funds LAST MILE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ID INSIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds PLANETREAD ↗
- Who funds ARMMAN-USA ↗
- Who funds OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP SECRETARIAT ↗
- Who funds ARROW ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN JUDGES ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE INDIA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AFRICAN WOMEN IN LAW ↗
- Who funds CLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
- Who funds THE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LET'S BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOC FOR FEMINIST ECONOM ↗
- Who funds WORLDBEING INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds INITIATIVE FOR MEDICINES ACCESS & KNOWLEDGE (I-MAK) INC ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR IMPACT EVALUATION INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER-THE EMERGING MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Women Deliver Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY NEW YORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · New Venture Fund · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Skoll Fund · The Skoll Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Open Society Institute
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc?
Find your warmest path to Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.