Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

INTERACTION TRANSITION

INTERACTION TRANSITION (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,507,002 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ($2,507,002). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$291k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$2.5M
Grants received
$158k
Net assets
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 79%

Against its field

INTERACTION TRANSITION has grown faster than half of the 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−18% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)20% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($70k) Expenses 100 ($116k) Net assets 100 ($166k)2022 Revenue 345 ($240k) Expenses 161 ($187k) Net assets 69 ($115k)2023 Revenue 449 ($312k) Expenses 213 ($248k) Net assets 108 ($179k)2024 Revenue 500 ($347k) Expenses 272 ($316k) Net assets 127 ($210k)2025 Revenue 419 ($291k) Expenses 296 ($343k) Net assets 95 ($158k)
20172022202320242025
Revenue (419)Expenses (296)Net assets (95)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2025 67%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of INTERACTION TRANSITION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,767 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$46k
17
$54k
22
$64k
23
$31k
24
$52k
25
5.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $120k → $0.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
2

From the IRS filings of INTERACTION TRANSITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of INTERACTION TRANSITION's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like INTERACTION TRANSITION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

2
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERACTION TRANSITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERACTION TRANSITION?
INTERACTION TRANSITION (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,507,002 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ($2,507,002). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INTERACTION TRANSITION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $2,507,002 in grants to INTERACTION TRANSITION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERACTION TRANSITION?
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $2,507,002 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERACTION TRANSITION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing