Texas · Nonprofit
HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC
HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $282,376 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF LAMAR COUNTY ($96,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC is better cushioned than half of the 5,983 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,983 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Lamar County Fire Fighters Associationlocal
- Cch Management Corporationportfolio match
- National Equity Fund Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 76% · 2021 51% · 2022 69% · 2023 74% · 2024 78% · 2025 76%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
85% of HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $61k → $16.
2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 60% · 2019 60% · 2020 45% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
88% of HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC's grant income comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $80k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Lamar County Fire Fighters AssociationlocalTX · funds 16 organizations near you
- Cch Management Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Equity Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Housing Action Illinoisportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Elderly Housing Dev & Operationsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bowdoin Apartments Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New York Mortgage Coalition Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Home Builders Care Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Russell and Josephine Kott Memorial Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Futureportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ten County Aging Board Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Enterprise Community Partners Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
91% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC?
- HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $282,376 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF LAMAR COUNTY ($96,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $282,376 in grants to HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC?
- UNITED WAY OF LAMAR COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $96,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing