· Community foundation
St Joseph's Community Foundation
The mission of the organization is to perpetuate the mission of the sisters of charity of the incarnate word and their 92-year tradition of improving the availability and effectiveness of medical care in the red river valley with a special emphasis on persons who are underserved or in financial need.this is accomplished by providing…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $77,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $152,528 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $75,428 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARIS JUNIOR COLLEGE | $25,500 |
| PARIS LAMAR COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT | $14,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PARIS | $9,850 |
| UNITED WAY OF LAMAR COUNTY | $8,000 |
| THE FRIENDS OF FORT TOWSON INC | $7,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON | $6,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTEXAS RAMP PROJECT7× · 2018–2024 · $68k · revenue +144%
- UWUNITED WAY OF LAMAR COUNTY4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +6%
- TCTHE CHILDRENS CENTER INC DBA CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF PARIS3× · 2018–2020 · $31k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- ACARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +57%
- LULamar Universityone grant, 2024 · $10k
- SSAFE-Tone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support and empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to improve their quality of life.
To promote and encourage agriculture production by educating youth and sponsoring exhibitions of livestock and farm products.
To provide support and services for persons with disabilities to enable them to become active members of the community.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To provide a place for children to go where they will have supervised activities, arts, crafts, and recreation.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…
To alleviate financial crisis and provide a medical home to the underserved. Strive to ensure that no one in Rockwall County goes to bed hungry, or without a roof overhead, or is deprived of needed medical care.
Texas Gun Sense is a statewide nonprofit and nonpartisan organization advocating to prevent gun violence and other gun tragedies in Texas through education, partnerships, and policy change.
To promote wellness, enriching the lives of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.
To enhance the lives of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Our mission is to end Veteran homelessness in Texas and throughout America by providing shelter, transitional living, counseling, case management, job training and job placement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Center Inc Dba Childrens Advocacy Center of Paris and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Fort Towson Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CITYSQUARE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAMAR COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS CENTER INC DBA CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF PARIS ↗
- Who funds TAILORED RIDES EQUINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC ↗
- Who funds KING'S DAUGHTERS AND KING'S SONS - FIRST CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds Red River Valley Down Syndrome Society ↗
- Who funds ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
- Who funds Friends of Fort Towson Inc ↗
- Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of the Red River Valle y ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ram Foundation · United Way of Lamar County · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St Joseph's Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.