Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

South Carolina · Nonprofit

HORSE CREEK ACADEMY

HORSE CREEK ACADEMY (South Carolina) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,221 to it, the largest being AIKEN HORSE PARK FOUNDATION ($3,925). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$18M
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$5k
Grants received
$633k
Net assets
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

HORSE CREEK ACADEMY has grown faster than three-quarters of the 3,681 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve3.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)23% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,681 education nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.6M) Expenses 100 ($3.9M) Net assets -287 ($-1541334)2018 Revenue 122 ($4.4M) Expenses 118 ($4.6M) Net assets -939 ($-5043775)2019 Revenue 130 ($4.7M) Expenses 117 ($4.6M) Net assets -1078 ($-5789862)2020 Revenue 140 ($5.0M) Expenses 125 ($4.9M) Net assets -1214 ($-6524598)2021 Revenue 248 ($8.9M) Expenses 228 ($8.9M) Net assets -1305 ($-7013143)2022 Revenue 347 ($13M) Expenses 340 ($13M) Net assets -1594 ($-8563128)2023 Revenue 427 ($15M) Expenses 374 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($537k)2024 Revenue 484 ($17M) Expenses 441 ($17M) Net assets 131 ($705k)2025 Revenue 512 ($18M) Expenses 474 ($19M) Net assets 118 ($633k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (512)Expenses (474)Net assets (118)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 96% · 2018 93% · 2019 95% · 2020 96% · 2021 97% · 2022 96% · 2023 91% · 2024 92% · 2025 92%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of HORSE CREEK ACADEMY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (23% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,261 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$309k
17
$225k
18
$109k
19
$131k
20
$5k
21
$777k
22
$755k
23
$167k
24
$71k
25
3.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $196 → $1k.

Funder
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
2
3
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $46M from one payer (an institutional transfer, not a grant programme, largest Limestone Charter Association). These are real filings, and they are not money HORSE CREEK ACADEMY raised.

From the IRS filings of HORSE CREEK ACADEMY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HORSE CREEK ACADEMY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

75%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 88% · 2023 57%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of HORSE CREEK ACADEMY's grant income comes from South Carolina funders.

MO
SC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

22
23
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $950 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like HORSE CREEK ACADEMY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HORSE CREEK ACADEMY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HORSE CREEK ACADEMY?
HORSE CREEK ACADEMY (South Carolina) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,221 to it, the largest being AIKEN HORSE PARK FOUNDATION ($3,925). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HORSE CREEK ACADEMY have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $5,221 in grants to HORSE CREEK ACADEMY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HORSE CREEK ACADEMY?
AIKEN HORSE PARK FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,925 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HORSE CREEK ACADEMY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing