Loading…
Loading…
Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
HERITAGE VALLEY SEWICKLEY FOUNDATION (Pennsylvania) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $120,505 in grants to it, the largest being THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ($101,455). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
$1k from 1 funders in 2023, up from $29k and 2 in 2017.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 84% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HERITAGE VALLEY SEWICKLEY FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
HERITAGE VALLEY SEWICKLEY FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 84% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
HERITAGE VALLEY SEWICKLEY FOUNDATION is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
69% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 11 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing