Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE

GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $152,161 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($89,400). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 82% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2023
$229k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$152k
Net assets
$76k
5/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What Gilbert and Sullivan Society of San Jose does

Mission

The Gilbert & Sullivan Society of San Jose/Lyric Theatre is a community-based organization which serves the community by presenting family oriented light opera, conducts outreach programs, and offers development opportunities for our volunteer base.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Presented our Light Opera Festival at the Hammer Theatre in San Jose, CA over three weekends between July 23, 2023 and August 7, 2023. There were performances of "Pirates of Penzance", "Into the Woods", and "Light Opera Around the World".

    $97,422 spent$47,631 earned by the program
    74% of program spending
  2. Presented the operetta Orange Blossoms at the Hammer Theatre in San Jose, CA during March of 2023. This was a small production - part of our "Discovery" series.

    $8,620 spent$9,600 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  3. none

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  4. Received ticket sale revenue and incurred expenses related to the next fiscal year's show productions.

    $24,993 spent$4,824 earned by the program
    19% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2022 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $131,035.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($175k) Expenses 100 ($140k) Net assets 100 ($63k)2021 Revenue 51 ($90k) Expenses 56 ($78k) Net assets 120 ($75k)2022 Revenue 72 ($126k) Expenses 97 ($135k) Net assets 105 ($66k)2023 Revenue 130 ($229k) Expenses 157 ($219k) Net assets 121 ($76k)
2020202120222023
Revenue (130)Expenses (157)Net assets (121)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $63k to $75k (+20%).

$63k
$75k
$66k
$76k
2020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

29% of GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$36k
’20
$12k
’21
−$9k
’22
$10k
’23
4.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2020202120222023
Listed13131311
Joined·+3+1+1
No longer listed·313
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $2k → $58k.

4 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 82% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE.

59%
largest funder
90%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 94% · 2021 100% · 2022 51% · 2023 46% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

82% of GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $27k that is directly attributable, 92% of it comes from California funders.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $125k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 17,174 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · above the median
Months of reserve4.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,174 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023

Organizations like GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

60% of spending goes to programs.

Program 60%Management 40%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE?
GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $152,161 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($89,400). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 82% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $152,161 in grants to GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $89,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GILBERT AND SULLIVAN SOCIETY OF SAN JOSE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Gilbert and Sullivan Society of San Jose →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2020–2023), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing