How much did CORECIVIC FOUNDATION THE grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of CORECIVIC FOUNDATION THE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k25 grants · $284k
$50k–250k1 grant · $220k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$28k

Total assets

Largest grants

UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN NASHVILL$220,000
THE NEXT DOOR RECOVERY$20,000
OTHER$19,000
MEN OF VALOR$15,000
RENEWAL HOUSE$15,000
YOU HAVE THE POWER$15,000
CASA NASHVILLE$10,000
THIS IS LIVING MINISTRIES$10,000
TN YOUTH COURTS$10,000
LEAVING THE COCOON$10,000
EDUCATION EQUAL OPPORTUNITY GROUP$10,000
NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$10,000
REFUGE CENTER FOR COUNSELING INC$10,000
TN VOICES FOR VICTIMS$10,000
DISMAS HOUSE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.0M · 29 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +108% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.0M

$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%

-12%

Still filing today

55%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PL
PLAY LIKE A GIRL
5× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +172%
TN
THE NEXT DOOR
5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +38%
YH
YOU HAVE THE POWER
6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +47%

Funded once

UW
UNITED WAY - COVID RESPONSE FUND
one grant, 2020 · $25k
PI
PHASE II ADULT REENTRY TRAINING CAM
one grant, 2024 · $15k
TH
TN HIGHER EDUCATION INITIATIVE
one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Mend House Sober

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health

Center for Effective Life Transitions

Family Resource Center wherein we provide a variety of intervention services including Domestic Violence Prevention, Child Abuse Prevention treatment services, and Family Counseling. In addition we offer Re-Entry Services for prison…

Health

Redemption House Ministry Inc

Redemption House is a transition home for women that serves as an alternative to incarceration by developing a faith-based lifestyle and by gaining the skills needed to live successfully on their own.

Religion

Redemption Road Ministries

Redemption road provides housing, re-entry and transition services for men and women coming out of the criminal justice system. the mission is to provide to provide christ centered, bible based recovery from drug and alcohol abuse, damaged…

Religion

Next Door Ministries

The organization's purpose is to provide resources for men taking the next steps from recovery to a sustainable lifestyle. Our goal is to create a path to success for men struggling with a broken life pattern by providing a Christ-centered…

Religion

Breakthru House Inc

Transforming lives of women struggling with drug and alcohol addiction by providing a long-term residential program to experience physical, emotional and spiritual healing through recovery. as the first long-term residential recovery…

Health

Empowering Men and Women on the Move for Re-Entry Inc

Empowering Men and Women On the Move for Re-entry Inc, Supportive Housing Program for who are Homeless in Metro Atlanta. Mission Improve Quality of Life.

Crime & Legal

The Restoration House of

The restoration house's mission is helping to restore single mothers and their children back to god's good intent for their lives.

Human Services

Re-Fined

Re-fined's mission is to form restorative relationships with the exploited throughout the critical phases of their healing journey.

Human Services

Next Step Recovery Ministries

Next Step is a 12 month residential program for men recovering from addiction and other life-crippling decisions. We provide mentorship counseling volunteerism and job opportunities.

Human Services

Truly Reaching You Inc

Truly Reaching You Ministries is a relationship based reentry organization that reaches out to men who have served their sentences and are returning to their communities. Through relationships, mentorship, training and education, TRY…

Crime & Legal

House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mending Hearts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nashville Youth Basketball Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

18/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,275,000Crime & Legal$225,000Human Services$196,000Education$170,000Housing & Shelter$80,000Civil Rights$75,000Recreation & Sports$35,000Health$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of MiddleTN36.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle · Hca Healthcare Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Frist Foundation · The Healing Trust · Joe C Davis Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist · Nashville Predators Foundation · Boulevard Bolt Inc · Louie M & Betty M Phillips Foundatn · The Steven & Laurie Eskind

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CORECIVIC FOUNDATION THE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FAMILY RECONCILIATION CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~45 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +52% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 581593837 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FAMILY RECONCILIATION CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 45 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Corecivic Foundation The?

Find your warmest path to Corecivic Foundation The through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CORECIVIC FOUNDATION THE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Corecivic Foundation The?

More from the funding graph

CORECIVIC FOUNDATION THE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Corecivic Foundation The?

More from the funding graph