Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 23 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $3,649,950 in grants to it, the largest being OPEN SOCIETY POLICY CENTER INC ($1,600,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $127k → $325k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 79%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 75% · 2018 58% · 2019 73% · 2020 68% · 2021 86% · 2022 36% · 2023 69% · 2024 84% · 2025 62% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
36% of FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL draws 97% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C. — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 14 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 23 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
55% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 24 states
Part of a family of 2 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 23funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing