Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER

FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $428,086 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($424,509). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$815k
Revenue FY2023
4
Funders on record
$428k
Grants received
$38k
Net assets
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%

Against its field

FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $428k to it.

Operating margin−5% · below the median
Months of reserve0.5mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,271 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($883k) Expenses 100 ($820k) Net assets 100 ($99k)2018 Revenue 110 ($975k) Expenses 122 ($1.0M) Net assets 72 ($72k)2019 Revenue 123 ($1.1M) Expenses 119 ($976k) Net assets 186 ($184k)2020 Revenue 156 ($1.4M) Expenses 170 ($1.4M) Net assets 170 ($168k)2021 Revenue 121 ($1.1M) Expenses 140 ($1.2M) Net assets 88 ($88k)2022 Revenue 94 ($827k) Expenses 102 ($836k) Net assets 79 ($79k)2023 Revenue 92 ($815k) Expenses 105 ($859k) Net assets 38 ($38k)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (92)Expenses (105)Net assets (38)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,235 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$62k
17
$27k
18
$112k
19
$16k
20
$81k
21
$9k
22
$44k
23
0.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $14k → $29k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1

3 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 99% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER.

99%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 93% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 1 state.

VA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $427k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER?
FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $428,086 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($424,509). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $428,086 in grants to FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $424,509 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FOOTSTOOL MISSIONS CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing