Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,055,950 to it, the largest being MILKY WAY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ($1,000,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.1M
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$1.1M
Net assets
$144k
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What Epigenetic Clock Development Foundation does

Mission

The clock foundation was formed for the specific and primary purpose of conducting medical research on aging and age-related diseases. Developing the epigenetic aging clock into a useful technology will require medical research on aging and age-related diseases. Consequently, the activity will advance clock foundation's specific purpose of conducting medical research on aging and age-related diseases. If the medical research of the clock foundation is successful and the fda approves the clock foundation's testing method, many new drugs or treatments that are able to reverse epigenetic aging could then be formally approved by the fda for the treatment of aging and for use in preventative medicine.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Internal research program:since inception we have focused on development of epigenetic clocks as a key enabling technology for the field. We are a small team of dedicated researchers, and this year hired additional part-time operational, admin, and finance staff, along with a new research associate. We continued to work closely with our scientific advisors, especially on development of novel testing approaches. The horvath mammalian array, a key enabling technology for translational aging research, was published in nature communications, with additional papers published in 2023 in science and nature aging. Additional papers have been released on dogs in pnas, cats, horses, sheep, marsupials, naked mole rats, and many others. The papers describe the discovery of universal mammalian aging clocks & epigenetic predictors of maximum lifespan.

    $95,167 spent$33,600 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  2. External research collaborations: interventional longevity studies we conducted many new interventional studies, for clinical trials and also preclinical studies. This includes studies on plasmapharesis, young plasma treatment, stem cell exosomes, bone marrow transplants, umbilical cord plasma, antiretroviral treatments, and a senolytic gene therapy. We also completed analysis for a >1,000-person longitudinal study of testosterone treatment, analyzing its effects on established clinical & functional aging biomarkers. Mechanisms of aging studies there were many notable mechanistic studies this past year including from the hochedlinger lab on the role of cellular heterogeneity in epigenetic clock results, the daley lab on lin28's role in reprogramming, the levin lab on limb regeneration, the gladyshev lab on bone marrow transplants.

    $2,378,281 spent$2,844,903 earned by the program
    70% of program spending
  3. Other program services

    $939,075 spent$6,889 earned by the program
    28% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,412,523.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($533k) Expenses 100 ($285k) Net assets 100 ($250k)2021 Revenue 520 ($2.8M) Expenses 834 ($2.4M) Net assets 262 ($656k)2022 Revenue 674 ($3.6M) Expenses 1192 ($3.4M) Net assets 264 ($661k)2023 Revenue 541 ($2.9M) Expenses 1214 ($3.5M) Net assets 4 ($9k)2024 Revenue 389 ($2.1M) Expenses 643 ($1.8M) Net assets 58 ($144k)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (389)Expenses (643)Net assets (58)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $955k to $330k (−65%).

$262k
$709k
$1.2M
$955k
$330k
20202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$249k
’20
$401k
’21
$203k
’22
−$568k
’23
$245k
’24
0.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Robert Brooke

Executive director

Board chair

Stefan Horvath

Director, chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

20202021202220232024
Listed33333
Joined·+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·0000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $1.0M → $34k.

Funder
'21
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Erase Ptsd Now Incunclassified
$42k
funders
1
1
2
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

95%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.

DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $14k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 8,121 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin12% · above the median
Months of reserve0.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)40% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,121 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $339k on record.

Federal$339k
grants $0contracts $339k
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$192k
  • Department of Agriculture$65k
  • Department of Commerce$64k
  • Department of the Interior$19k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

99% of spending goes to programs.

Program 99%Management 1%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION?
EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,055,950 to it, the largest being MILKY WAY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ($1,000,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $1,055,950 in grants to EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION?
MILKY WAY RESEARCH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like EPIGENETIC CLOCK DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Epigenetic Clock Development →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing