Washington · Nonprofit
DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER
DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $307,367 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($140,273). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER has grown faster than three-quarters of the 694 crime & legal nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 694 crime & legal nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Associationlocalportfolio match
- Yakima Rotary Charitieslocalportfolio match
- Yakima Valley Farm Workers Cliniclocalportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 20% · 2019 21% · 2020 63% · 2021 71% · 2022 88% · 2023 90% · 2024 92% · 2025 84%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
84% of DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (93% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $10k → $79.
2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 46% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 59% · 2021 58% · 2022 64% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER's grant income comes from Washington funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $141k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Associationlocalportfolio matchWA · funds 17 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Yakima Rotary Charitieslocalportfolio matchWA · funds 14 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Yakima Valley Farm Workers Cliniclocalportfolio matchWA · funds 13 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Sheng-Yen Lu Foundationshared fundersWA · backs 37 organizations that share your funders
- Washington Progress Fundshared fundersWA · backs 31 organizations that share your funders
- National Association For Community Mediationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Multi-Ethnic Business AssociationlocalWA · funds 53 organizations near you
- Oneamericaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Thurston Countyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of the Blue Mountainsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Front and Centeredshared fundersWA · backs 38 organizations that share your funders
- Latino Community Fund of Washington Stateshared fundersWA · backs 40 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
72% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
90%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER?
- DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $307,367 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($140,273). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $307,367 in grants to DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER?
- YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $140,273 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing