Loading…
Loading…
Montana · Nonprofit
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS (Montana) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $637,053 in grants to it, the largest being Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation ($515,700). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 4,442 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,442 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $17k → $76k.
From the IRS filings of DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 67% · 2019 89% · 2020 84% · 2021 82% · 2022 87% · 2023 79% · 2024 82% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Montana — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 1 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you typical among the 74 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing