How much did DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

covid veteranveteran outreach

2022

—

2023

outreachclinicdav

2024

veteran busbus vdohveteran conventionconvention travelmen womenempowering leadlives respect

2025

veteranbetter livesmedicalhomelesshuntingmen womenempowering lead

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k31 grants · $237k
$10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$50k–250k1 grant · $66k

$7,649

Median grant

States reached

$2.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

DAV NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION$65,514
DAV CHAPTER 37 HUTCHINSON$16,250
DAV CHAPTER 1 MINNEAPOLIS$12,000
MN VETERANS OUTDOORS$10,198
MINNESOTA VETERANS FOOD PANTRY$10,000
DAV CHAPTER 38 PARK RAPIDS$9,741
DAV CHAPTER 39 ANOKA$9,329
DAV CHAPTER 40 SOUTH METRO$9,264
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION INC$8,969
DAV CHAPTER 3 HIBBING$8,800
DAV CHAPTER 22 CROW WING CTY$8,700
DAV CHAPTER 25 FERGUS FALLS$8,700
DAV CHAPTER 20 FAIRBAULT$8,500
DAV CHAPTER 7 NORTH CENTRAL$8,125
DAV CHAPTER 13 ITASCA CO$7,750

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 34 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%

-1%

Still filing today

56%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DN
DAV NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2025 · $201k · revenue +78%
DC
DAV CHAPTER 37 HUTCHINSON
6× · 2019–2025 · $71k · revenue +39%
DC
DAV CHAPTER 38 PARK RAPIDS
3× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +63%

Funded once

DA
DAV AUXILIARY
one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue -1%
DA
DAV AUXILIARY
one grant, 2019 · $13k
TC
TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION
one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Disabled American Veterans of Texas

Human Services

Disabled American Veterans

To provide services to individuals who were disabled due to or during their military service.

—

Disabled American Veterans

Assisting disabled American veterans

—

Paralyzed Veterans of America

The gateway chapter paralyzed veterans of america will use our unique expertise to ensure quality healthcare and provide programs that promote active lifestyles, expand opportunities, and enhance the quality of life for veterans and all…

—

Disabled American Veterans

To provide support for veterans & family

—

Disabled American Veterans

To Assist and Support Disabled Veterans

Public Benefit

Paralyzed Veterans of America -

We strive to improve the quality of life of honorably discharged veterans who have spinal cord injury, dysfunction or illness, including but not limited to ms and als, through programs described in sch o.

—

Disabled American Veterans (Dav) Charitable Service Trust

Empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. see part iii.

Public Benefit

Disabled American Veterans

Empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity by ensuring that veterans and their families can access the full range of benefits available to them.

—

Disabled American Veterans - Dept of Nj

Assistance to disabled american veterans including assistance with claims, information and literature and assist local chapters and coordinate state convention

—

Disabled American Veterans

Veterans Fraternal Organization, provides assistance to veterans with filing benefits claims with Veterans Administration, provides transportation to veterans to medical appointments at VA Medical Center in Salt Lake City UT, provides…

Public Benefit

Disabled American Veteran Sonoma County

DAV is a nonprofit charity that provides lifetime support for veterans of all generations and their families. Nationally, it helps more than 1 million veterans in positive, life-changing ways each year. With over 1,200 chapters and more…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disabled American Veterans and the most unlike its peers is Twin Cities Public Television Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 84 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/42

the rest of the field

10%

2,652/25,957

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

11/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$1,208,969Other$998,008Public Benefit$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Disabled American Veterans of MinnesotaMN20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Disabled American Veterans of Minnesota

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 411721688 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Disabled American Veterans Department?

Find your warmest path to Disabled American Veterans Department through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Disabled American Veterans Department?

More from the funding graph

DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS DEPARTMENT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Disabled American Veterans Department?

More from the funding graph