Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN

DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN (Michigan) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $309,337 to it, the largest being The Skadden Foundation ($167,059). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$5.3M
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$309k
Net assets
$971k
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%
01What it does

What Disability Rights Michigan does

Mission

The mission of Disability Rights Michigan (drm) is to advocate and protect the legal rights of people with disabilities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Provide direct advocacy and training to 1,101 persons with developmental disabilities including but not limited to areas of accessibility, education, housing, abuse & neglect, health care, employment, and transportation. Through systemic impact litigation and group advocacy, the rights of 95,847 people were enforced, protected, restored, or expanded.

    $910,203 spent
    20% of program spending
  2. Provide advocacy and training to 1,905 persons with serious mental illness in the areas of abuse & neglect in facilities, housing, education, guardianship, and health care. Completed in person and virtual monitoring of state psychiatric facilities and state prisons affecting 8,585 individuals. Through systemic impact litigation and group advocacy, the rights of 211,487 people were enforced, protected, restored, or expanded. And all state psychiatric facilities are monitored.

    $902,418 spent
    20% of program spending
  3. Conduct 254 site reviews for individuals receiving social security benefits in order to mitigate the risk of fraud, financial misuse, neglect or abuse to the intended beneficiaries by the representative payees. Served 7,975 beneficiaries in current period.

    $887,748 spent
    19% of program spending
  4. Provide direct advocacy and training to 2,382 adults with disabilities in the areas of accessibility, accommodations, education, employment, housing, and health care. Number of persons trained 1,046. Through systemic impact litigation and group advocacy, the rights of 126,233 people were enforced, protected, restored, or expanded.

    $499,667 spent
    11% of program spending
  5. Providing information, technical assistance, or direct representation to 253 individuals regarding all services and benefits available to them and their rights under the rehab act of 1973. Number of persons trained 903.

    $379,328 spent
    8% of program spending
  6. Providing information, technical assistance, or direct advocacy to 127 beneficiaries of social security in employment and work related overpayments. Number of persons trained 523.

    $235,278 spent
    5% of program spending
  7. Vaccine grants: the covid-19 vaccine advocacy funding was initially planned to conclude at the end of fy25 and drm was set to close the project in q1. Drm began to scale down project staffing at the end of fy24, with additional reductions implemented for fy25. Due to the ongoing need for vaccine education and outreach within underserved communities, drm decided to fulfill the contract. However, with the transition to the new federal administration, funding for the initiative was concluded in q2. Consequently, project activities and outcomes reflect only two quarters. At the end of fy24, docgo, drm's primary mobile clinic provider, did not renew its contract with drm. The loss of docgo significantly impacted the program's capacity to provide on-site and clinic vaccination services. Despite this reduction in operational ability, drm successfully administered 375 covid vaccinations and 449 flu shots at 17 events held in collaboration with local health departments and a new private provider, fnp collaborative solutions. These efforts ensured continued community access to vaccination and health education resources. Drm's communications team actively shared updates on covid-19 testing…

    $154,987 spent
    3% of program spending
  8. Provide direct advocacy, training, and legal representation to 217 persons with disabilities in accessing assistive technology devices, related services, and accommodations. Through systemic impact litigation and group advocacy, the rights of 3,570 people were enforced, protected, restored, or expanded.

    $140,847 spent
    3% of program spending
  9. Provided advocacy and training to 291 persons with traumatic brain injury. Seek and secure services in the areas of guardianship, government benefits, housing, health care, and veteran's services. Through systemic impact litigation and group advocacy, the rights of 2,606 people were enforced, protected, restored, or expanded.

    $132,851 spent
    3% of program spending
  10. Provide voter trainings and short term assistance to more than 399 persons and disseminate informational pieces regarding disability voting rights, voting accessibility to 2 polling places.

    $97,939 spent
    2% of program spending
  11. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $263,232 spent
    6% of program spending

The 11 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,604,498.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.3M) Expenses 100 ($3.3M) Net assets 100 ($818k)2018 Revenue 109 ($3.6M) Expenses 109 ($3.6M) Net assets 99 ($813k)2019 Revenue 131 ($4.4M) Expenses 129 ($4.3M) Net assets 106 ($870k)2021 Revenue 133 ($4.4M) Expenses 133 ($4.4M) Net assets 104 ($848k)2022 Revenue 171 ($5.7M) Expenses 169 ($5.6M) Net assets 110 ($902k)2023 Revenue 198 ($6.6M) Expenses 197 ($6.6M) Net assets 112 ($913k)2024 Revenue 188 ($6.3M) Expenses 186 ($6.2M) Net assets 117 ($959k)2025 Revenue 159 ($5.3M) Expenses 158 ($5.3M) Net assets 119 ($971k)
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (159)Expenses (158)Net assets (119)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $2.0M to $3.6M (+77%).

$1.7M
$1.7M
$1.9M
$1.7M
$1.8M
$1.9M
$2.0M
$3.6M
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 99% · 2018 99% · 2019 98% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 99% · 2024 99% · 2025 98%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,814 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$7k
’17
−$5k
’18
$57k
’19
−$394
’21
$55k
’22
$11k
’23
$46k
’24
$13k
’25
6.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Michelle Lindsay

Executive director

Board chair

Veronica Ibrahim

Pac chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2024 and FY2025 filings.

'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1718161617231618
Joined·+1+2·+1+7+0+6
No longer listed·04·0174
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $37k → $69k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Usagingunclassified
$85k
funders
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
1

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

29% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN.

54%
largest funder
98%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 99% · 2018 55% · 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN draws 83% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan, across 3 states in all.

MI
NY
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 7,349 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve6.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,349 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $40.1M on record.

Federal$40.1M
grants $40.1Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$23.1M
  • Social Security Administration$9.4M
  • Department of Education$7.7M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 13%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Drm Supporting Corp · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN?
DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN (Michigan) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $309,337 to it, the largest being The Skadden Foundation ($167,059). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $309,337 in grants to DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN?
The Skadden Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $167,059 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like DISABILITY RIGHTS MICHIGAN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Disability Rights Michigan →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing