Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC

DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC (Massachusetts) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $25,500 to it, the largest being Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$246k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$26k
Grants received
$226k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%

Against its field

DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC is better cushioned than half of the 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve17.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($98k) Expenses 100 ($74k) Net assets 100 ($64k)2018 Revenue 2 ($2k) Expenses 27 ($20k) Net assets 72 ($46k)2019 Revenue 102 ($100k) Expenses 152 ($112k) Net assets 53 ($34k)2020 Revenue 76 ($75k) Expenses 50 ($37k) Net assets 113 ($72k)2021 Revenue 189 ($185k) Expenses 150 ($111k) Net assets 229 ($146k)2022 Revenue 285 ($280k) Expenses 216 ($159k) Net assets 417 ($267k)2023 Revenue 155 ($152k) Expenses 202 ($149k) Net assets 286 ($183k)2024 Revenue 251 ($246k) Expenses 205 ($151k) Net assets 353 ($226k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (251)Expenses (205)Net assets (353)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $500 → $25k.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)98% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC.

98%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2021 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

98% of DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $500 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Massachusetts, across 1 state.

DE

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $25k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC?
DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC (Massachusetts) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $25,500 to it, the largest being Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $25,500 in grants to DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC.
Who is the largest funder of DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC?
Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like DIRECT ACTION FOR WOMEN NOW WORLD-WIDE INC FORMERLY INDIAS DAUGHTERS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing