Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
DICKINSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM (Michigan) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,363,319 in grants to it, the largest being MICHIGAN HEALTH & HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ($1,109,136). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
DICKINSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM has grown faster than half of the 1,388 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,388 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of DICKINSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
$158k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $191k and 2 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of DICKINSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
DICKINSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 58% · 2018 78% · 2019 71% · 2020 59% · 2021 61% · 2022 75% · 2023 76% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
DICKINSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM is locally rooted: 63% of its grant income comes from Michigan funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 236 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $676k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
89% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 10 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2022–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing