Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

South Carolina Hospital Association

Leading south carolina to a better state of health.

$46k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202022.

Health$2.1M
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$12,247
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THREE RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$18,971
LAKE CITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$12,247
THE CAROLINA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$7,500
CAROLINA PINES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PIEDMONT MEDICAL CENTER: $36k → 8%HILTON HEAD HOSPITAL: $18k → 10%PRISMA HEALTH GREENVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $93k → 10%PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST PARKRIDGE HOSPITAL: $15k → 11%MUSC HEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $86k → 12%CONWAY MEDICAL CENTER: $28k → 13%PRISMA HEALTH TUOMEY HOSPITAL: $35k → 14%SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT INC: $146k → 15%TIDELANDS GEORGETOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $20k → 15%ANMED HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: $53k → 15%PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST EASLEY HOSPITAL: $18k → 16%PRISMA HEALTH RICHLAND HOSPITAL: $71k → 16%PRISMA HEALTH OCONEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $24k → 17%AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS: $34k → 17%NEWBERRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $16k → 17%PRISMA HEATH LAURENS COUNTY HOSPITAL: $15k → 18%SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE: $43k → 18%MCLEOD HEALTH CLARENDON: $16k → 20%MCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $59k → 20%REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $36k → 25%MUSC HEALTH MARION MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 32%PIEDMONT MEDICAL CENTER: $14k → 8%PRISMA HEALTH GREENVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $38k → 10%ROPER HOSPITAL: $40k → 12%KERSHAW HEALTH: $19k → 12%SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT INC: $57k → 15%ANMED HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: $22k → 15%PRISMA HEALTH RICHLAND HOSPITAL: $29k → 16%SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE: $17k → 18%MCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 20%REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $14k → 25%LEXINGTON MEDICAL CENTER: $58k → 11%MUSC HEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $33k → 12%ANMED HEALTH WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15k → 15%PROVIDENCE HEALTH - NORTHEAST: $15k → 16%LEXINGTON MEDICAL CENTER: $23k → 11%ROPER HOSPITAL: $16k → 12%MUSC HEALTH FLORENCE MEDICAL CENTER: $38k → 20%THREE RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $19k → 11%ROPER ST FRANCIS MOUNT PLEASANT HOSPITAL: $16k → 12%PROVIDENCE HEALTH - DOWNTOWN: $33k → 16%MUSC HEALTH FLORENCE MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 20%ST FRANCIS DOWNTOWN: $32k → 10%ST FRANCIS EASTSIDE: $17k → 10%EAST COOPER MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 12%PRISMA HEALTH PATEWOOD HOSPITAL: $15k → 10%BON SECOURS ST FRANCIS XAVIER HOSPITAL: $26k → 12%PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $16k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 26 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$1.9M
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Prisma Health-Upstate
    2× · 2020–2021 · $272k · revenue +28%
  • AH
    ANMED HEALTH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $95k · revenue +34%
  • MR
    MCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF THE PEE DEE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $88k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • WR
    WILLIAMSBURG REGIONAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue -74%
  • RS
    Roper St Francis Hospital - Berkeley Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roper St Francis Healthcare

Healing all people with compassion, faith, and excellence.

Health
2
Roper St Francis Physicians Network

Healing all people with compassion, faith and excellence.

Health
3
Roper St Francis Ancillary Services

As an operating subsidiary of Roper St. Francis Healthcare (RSFH), Roper St. Francis Ancillary Services (RSFAS) provides a wide range of healthcare services to support the work of the four hospitals that are part of the RSFH System. The…

Health
4
Clinical Biotechnology Research Institute at Rsfh

Healing all people with compassion, faith, and excellence.

Health
5
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
6
Mcleod Health Cheraw

Mcleod health cheraw operates as part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing excellence in…

Health
7
Mcleod Health

To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.

Health
8
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
9
Roper St Francis Foundation

The Roper St. Francis Foundation's mission is to advance the Roper St. Francis Healthcare mission of healing all people with compassion, faith and excellence through philanthropy.

Health
10
Roane County Medical Center

Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Bon Secours Ambulatory Services St Francis Llc

Bon Secours Ambulatory Services St. Francis, LLC (BSASSF) is an operating subsidiary of its sole member, Bon Secours Urgent Care SC LLC, which is a single member limited liability company (SMLLC) of BSMH Services, LLC. BSMH Services, LLC…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcleod Regional Medical Center of the Pee Dee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hampton Regional Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr13%25%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr19%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr13%35%20–35yr10%12%35–55yr19%27%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
14%
2,630/19,175

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY — $244,885 · OtherMEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYSPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM — $202,823 · OtherSPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMLEXINGTON COUNTY HEALTH SERVICE DISTRICT — $81,224 · OtherLEXINGTON COUNTY HEALTH SERVICE DISTRICTSt Francis Hospital Inc — $67,389 · OtherSt Francis Hospital IncPROVIDENCE HEALTH - DOWNTOWN — $66,548 · OtherPROVIDENCE HEALTH - DOWNTOWNSELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE — $60,193 · OtherPIEDMONT MEDICAL CENTER — $50,379 · OtherREGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF ORANGEBURG AND CALHOUN COUNTIES — $50,098 · OtherAIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS — $48,275 · Other+21 more — $285,643 · Other+21 morePrisma Health-Upstate — $271,613 · HealthPrisma Health-UpstatePrisma Health-Midlands — $179,878 · HealthPrisma Health-MidlandsANMED HEALTH — $94,729 · HealthANMED HEALTHMCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF THE PEE DEE INC — $87,961 · HealthMCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF THE PEE DEE INCRoper Hospital Inc — $56,548 · HealthRoper Hospital IncPrisma Health Tuomey — $49,677 · HealthCONWAY HOSPITAL INC — $39,443 · HealthBon Secours-St Francis Xavier Hospital Inc — $37,093 · Health+10 more — $155,744 · Health+10 more
Other$1,157,457Health$972,686

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPrisma Health-Upstate — $271,613 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health-Midlands — $179,878 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANMED HEALTH — $94,729 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF THE PEE DEE INC — $87,961 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Hospital Inc — $67,389 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoper Hospital Inc — $56,548 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health Tuomey — $49,677 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONWAY HOSPITAL INC — $39,443 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBon Secours-St Francis Xavier Hospital Inc — $37,093 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $28,367 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWACCAMAW COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — $27,386 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoper St Francis Mt Pleasant Hospital — $21,918 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCLEOD HEALTH CLARENDON — $21,356 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAMSBURG REGIONAL HOSPITAL — $13,505 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRoper St Francis Hospital - Berkeley Inc — $12,445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $10,665 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTri-County Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse — $7,184 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCLEOD LORIS SEACOAST HOSPITAL — $6,838 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCLEOD MEDICAL CENTER DILLON — $5,764 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate
  • Who funds Prisma Health-Midlands
  • Who funds ANMED HEALTH
  • Who funds MCLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF THE PEE DEE INC
  • Who funds St Francis Hospital Inc
  • Who funds Roper Hospital Inc
  • Who funds Prisma Health Tuomey
  • Who funds CONWAY HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Bon Secours-St Francis Xavier Hospital Inc
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
  • Who funds WACCAMAW COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
  • Who funds Roper St Francis Mt Pleasant Hospital
  • Who funds MCLEOD HEALTH CLARENDON
  • Who funds WILLIAMSBURG REGIONAL HOSPITAL
  • Who funds Roper St Francis Hospital - Berkeley Inc
  • Who funds HAMPTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duke EndowmentNC15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duke Endowment · Duke Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization South Carolina Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph