Loading…
Loading…
Delaware · Nonprofit
DELAWARE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION (Delaware) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $570,052 in grants to it, the largest being TD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($280,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
DELAWARE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 60 social science nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 60 social science nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
96% of DELAWARE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (76% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $60k → $90k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of DELAWARE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
DELAWARE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 93% · 2020 56% · 2021 91% · 2023 100% · 2024 94% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
DELAWARE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Delaware — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $410k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
85% of spending goes to programs.
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing