How much did BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER INC grant in FY2023?

Education$441kHealth$325kRecreation & Sports$250kHuman Services$79kPublic Benefit$50kCommunity Improvement$44kPhilanthropy$41kHousing & Shelter$35kYouth Development$5kOther$362k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

healthysportsyouthbreast cancer

2020

healthyyouthsportsbreast cancer

2021

sportsbreast cancer

2022

independentnon-profit

2023

knowledgechildrenprivateleadershipadvance balancedbalanced economicbreast cancer

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k9 grants · $54k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$50k–250k5 grants · $439k

$8,750

Median grant

States reached

$1.6B

Total assets

Largest grants

DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY$130,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$109,000
KENT COUNTY REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX CORPORATION$100,000
DELAWARE TECH & COMMUNITY COLLEGE$50,000
LEADERSHIP DELAWARE INC$50,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY DELAWARE$10,000
CENTRAL DELAWARE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$8,990
DELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION$8,750
EASTER SEALS DELAWARE & MARYLAND'S EASTE$6,500
MODERN MATURITY CENTER INC$5,001
HARRY K FOUNDATION$5,001
TOWN OF SMYRNA$5,001
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,001
GIRLS ON THE RUN DELAWARE$5,001
GREATER MILFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,001

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+23%

Still filing today

82%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DT
Delaware Technical Community
5× · 2018–2023 · $251k · revenue +29%
KC
KENT COUNTY REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX CORPORATION
4× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +1027%
AH
American Heart Association
6× · 2018–2023 · $201k · revenue +14%

Funded once

DU
Donations under 5K
one grant, 2018 · $72k
DI
Dover Interfaith Missiongraduated
one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +34%
AC
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY
one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Delaware

Instruction, research, and public services are the university's most significant activities.

—

Better Business Bureau of Delaware

Community Improvement

Delaware Center for Health Innovation Inc

The organization develops, facilitates, and oversees the implementation of collaborative efforts aimed at transforming the delivery of health care services in delaware.

—

Delaware Advancement Corporation

Economic development

—

Delaware State Golf Association

—

Maryland-Delaware-Dc Press

Education

Delaware Center for Justice

The delaware center for justice, inc. is the leading non-profit organization in delaware committed to transforming the quality of justice through advocacy, policy, and practice.

Crime & Legal

Medical Society of Delaware

To promote the art & science of medicine among our members.

—

Delaware Prosperity Partnership Inc

The delaware prosperity partnership (dpp) was created as a private entity to lead the state of delaware's economic development efforts. establishment of this private entity was a critical step to enhance the state's ability to attract,…

Community Improvement

Delaware Dreams Inc

Philanthropy

Delaware County Economic Development

To promote economic development in delaware county pennsylvania.

—

Preservation Delaware

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delaware Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American College of Cardiology Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 33% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

871/9,976

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

20/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$440,501Other$442,584Health$325,319Recreation & Sports$250,000Human Services$79,002Public Benefit$50,000Community Improvement$44,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE31.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · United Way of Delaware · The Nemours Foundation · Milton and Hattie Kutz Foundation · Del-One Foundation · Chichester Dupont Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LEADERSHIP DELAWARE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~52 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 263527196 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LEADERSHIP DELAWARE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 52 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Bayhealth Medical Center Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bayhealth Medical Center Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bayhealth Medical Center Inc?

More from the funding graph

BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bayhealth Medical Center Inc?

More from the funding graph