Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Georgia · Nonprofit

DEKALB PRO BONO

DEKALB PRO BONO (Georgia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $88,352 to it, the largest being Georgia Bar Foundation Inc ($76,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$403k
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$88k
Grants received
$277k
Net assets
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%

Against its field

DEKALB PRO BONO runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve8.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($189k) Expenses 100 ($200k) Net assets 100 ($131k)2019 Revenue 119 ($225k) Expenses 115 ($230k) Net assets 96 ($126k)2020 Revenue 154 ($290k) Expenses 127 ($255k) Net assets 111 ($145k)2021 Revenue 355 ($670k) Expenses 326 ($651k) Net assets 133 ($174k)2022 Revenue 375 ($707k) Expenses 383 ($766k) Net assets 54 ($71k)2023 Revenue 139 ($262k) Expenses 122 ($245k) Net assets 115 ($151k)2024 Revenue 202 ($380k) Expenses 128 ($256k) Net assets 195 ($255k)2025 Revenue 214 ($403k) Expenses 191 ($381k) Net assets 212 ($277k)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (214)Expenses (191)Net assets (212)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 12% · 2021 12% · 2022 4% · 2023 29%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

51% of DEKALB PRO BONO’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,767 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$11k
18
$5k
19
$36k
20
$19k
21
$59k
22
$17k
23
$124k
24
$22k
25
8.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $5 → $20k.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'25*
total
funders
1
1
2
2
2

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of DEKALB PRO BONO’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

DEKALB PRO BONO leans on a few funders — its largest provides 86% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DEKALB PRO BONO.

86%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

95% of DEKALB PRO BONO's grant income comes from Georgia funders.

NY
GA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $8k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like DEKALB PRO BONO

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Georgia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

64% of spending goes to programs.

Program 64%Management 36%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DEKALB PRO BONO: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds DEKALB PRO BONO?
DEKALB PRO BONO (Georgia) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $88,352 to it, the largest being Georgia Bar Foundation Inc ($76,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does DEKALB PRO BONO have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $88,352 in grants to DEKALB PRO BONO, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of DEKALB PRO BONO?
Georgia Bar Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $76,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like DEKALB PRO BONO find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Georgia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing