Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Computing For All

Computing For All (Washington) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $310,368 to it, the largest being The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc ($100,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$3.3M
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$310k
Net assets
$298k
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 33%
01What it does

What Computing For All does

Mission

We seek to break down cultural and systemic social barriers that prevent young adults of all races, genders, and abilities from exploring computer science as a potential career.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. GJC/WJI: Computing For All launched the Washington Tech Workforce Coalition, as part of the Good Jobs Challenge GJC Grant, to organize the ecosystem to train and place 1000 people into tech jobs. The Washington Jobs Initiative (WJI) is a $23.5 million grant aiming to educate and train at least 5,000 Washingtonians with the hope of ensuring 3,150 good jobs by 2025. The WJI is the state-specific portion of the national Good Jobs Challenge, which aims to help more than 50,000 American workers into good, quality jobs. Computing For All Computing for All is the nonprofit chosen by the Washington Student Achievement Council to provide 1,000 job placements across all sectors of the IT and Cybersecurity industry by October 2025. Computing For All is leading the Washington Technology Workforce Coalition to bring together employers, educators, and other partners in this effort.

    $2,497,434 spent$2,776,567 earned by the program
    80% of program spending
  2. Digital Skills for All: Digital Skills For All is a set of educational programs for youth ages 16-24. These programs are attempting to create equitable career paths into Washington's booming tech sector, with a focus on under served populations. Major initiatives include a pre-apprenticeship program, project-based mentorship programs with industry partners, and work as an intermediary for CCW Career Prep and Career Launch programs; a pilot job training program ran at Delridge Community Center in Seattle, Washington.

    $626,616 spent$527,830 earned by the program
    20% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,124,050.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($186k) Expenses 100 ($178k) Net assets 100 ($38k)2021 Revenue 399 ($744k) Expenses 290 ($517k) Net assets 700 ($265k)2022 Revenue 407 ($759k) Expenses 416 ($742k) Net assets 744 ($282k)2023 Revenue 504 ($940k) Expenses 436 ($779k) Net assets 1171 ($443k)2024 Revenue 524 ($977k) Expenses 623 ($1.1M) Net assets 812 ($307k)2025 Revenue 1773 ($3.3M) Expenses 1857 ($3.3M) Net assets 786 ($298k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (1773)Expenses (1857)Net assets (786)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $489k to $1.1M (+121%).

$84k
$569k
$446k
$592k
$489k
$1.1M
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 90% · 2021 59% · 2022 88% · 2023 66% · 2024 80% · 2025 93%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Computing For All’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,352 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$8k
’20
$227k
’21
$17k
’22
$162k
’23
−$136k
’24
−$9k
’25
1.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202020212022202320242025
Listed345555
Joined·+2+1+0+0+1
No longer listed·10001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $61k → $83k.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Computing For All’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Computing For All leans on a few funders — its largest provides 32% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

68% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Computing For All.

32%
largest funder
75%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 47% · 2021 54% · 2022 41% · 2023 30% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

54% of Computing For All's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $144k that is directly attributable, 69% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 2 states.

WA
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $166k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Computing For All has grown faster than three-quarters of the 9,398 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve1.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)78% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,398 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Computing For All

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 3%Fundraising 2%

Governance

4
board members
25%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Computing For All: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Computing For All?
Computing For All (Washington) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $310,368 to it, the largest being The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc ($100,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Computing For All have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $310,368 in grants to Computing For All, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Computing For All?
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Computing For All find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Computing For All →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing