Tennessee · Nonprofit
COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES
COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES (Tennessee) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $190,156 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC ($117,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Roane County United Way Incshared funderslocal
- National Association For Community Mediationportfolio match
- United Way of Blount Countyshared funders
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 13% · 2018 12% · 2019 13% · 2020 13% · 2021 22% · 2022 19% · 2023 22% · 2024 28% · 2025 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $18k → $22k.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 70% · 2020 69% · 2021 68% · 2022 40% · 2023 54% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES's grant income comes from Tennessee funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Roane County United Way Incshared funderslocalTN · backs 9 organizations that share your funders · funds 4 organizations near you
- National Association For Community Mediationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Blount Countyshared fundersTN · backs 9 organizations that share your funders
- Jams Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Institute for Criminal Justice Reformportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New York State Casa Assoc Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Arbitration Association - Int'L Centre for Dispute Resolution Fndn Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bob Barker Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Working Woman's Home Association Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Criminal Justice Reform Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- H C Gemmer Family Christian Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Tennessee
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
93% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES?
- COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES (Tennessee) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $190,156 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC ($117,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $190,156 in grants to COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES?
- UNITED WAY OF CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC is the largest funder on record, with $117,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Tennessee. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing