Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES

COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES (Colorado) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,123,500 to it, the largest being THOMAS D HORMEL FOUNDATION INC ($900,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$35k
Revenue FY2025
15
Funders on record
$1.1M
Grants received
$69k
Net assets
2/15 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−606% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−20% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,609 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($136k) Expenses 100 ($122k) Net assets 100 ($14k)2020 Revenue 682 ($928k) Expenses 382 ($465k) Net assets 3342 ($477k)2021 Revenue 253 ($344k) Expenses 427 ($520k) Net assets 2116 ($302k)2022 Revenue 255 ($347k) Expenses 236 ($287k) Net assets 2531 ($361k)2023 Revenue 274 ($372k) Expenses 220 ($267k) Net assets 3267 ($467k)2024 Revenue 41 ($56k) Expenses 199 ($242k) Net assets 1962 ($280k)2025 Revenue 26 ($35k) Expenses 203 ($247k) Net assets 481 ($69k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (26)Expenses (203)Net assets (481)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

93% of COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (65% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 26,667 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$14k
19
$462k
20
$175k
21
$59k
22
$105k
23
$186k
24
$212k
25
20
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 6 funders to 2 funders, grant income rose $55k → $315k.

4 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 14 of 15 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

80%
largest funder
93%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 46% · 2021 72% · 2022 100% · 2023 95%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

0% of COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 13% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

94% of COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

WI
OH
CA
CO
MD
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
22
23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $41k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 15 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

21%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES?
COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES (Colorado) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,123,500 to it, the largest being THOMAS D HORMEL FOUNDATION INC ($900,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $1,123,500 in grants to COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES?
THOMAS D HORMEL FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $900,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 15funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing