Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN

CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,735 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$198k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$13k
Net assets
$462k
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Citizens Commission on Human Rights of Austin does

Mission

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights of Austin (cchr of austin) is a non-political, non-religious mental health industry watchdog whose mission is to eradicate abuses committed under the guise of mental health. We work to ensure patient and consumer protections are enacted.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Program service accomplishments:public awarenessin 2024 cchr austin continued on a state level and nationally to educate the public about the dangers of psychiatric drugging, the need for increased warnings and greater avenues of informed consent. In addition it continued its statewide speaking tour, giving presentations in locations ranging from the texas panhandle to the texas coast, educating parents and parent groups on parental rights in school mental health. Cchr austin continued its children's crusade to educate parents and others on how to advocate for themselves on issues surrounding school mental health and parental consent. Many parents showed up to the capitol to relay their experiences with school mental health and social and emotional learning. Cchr austin continued to service allied groups, individuals, and attorneys, educating them on issues including consent, and the problem of patients being held against their will in psychiatric facilities.researching psychiatric abuseduring 2024, cchr austin responded to school mental health related complaints, as well as seeing a post-covid return of allegations from patients and loved ones that they were held against their…

    $152,195 spent
    81% of program spending
  2. Legislative:cchr austin educated legislators on various committees about issues of psychiatric abuse, including voluntary patients being held against their will in psychiatric hospitals. Cchr austin also educated legislators on a number of mental heatlh activities being conducted in schools without parental consent. Many parents came to the capitol to tell legislators about what happened to their children in their own school districts.

    $34,906 spent
    19% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $187,101.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($779k) Expenses 100 ($260k) Net assets 100 ($746k)2022 Revenue 17 ($131k) Expenses 111 ($288k) Net assets 79 ($588k)2023 Revenue 30 ($234k) Expenses 106 ($277k) Net assets 73 ($545k)2024 Revenue 25 ($198k) Expenses 108 ($281k) Net assets 62 ($462k)
2021202220232024
Revenue (25)Expenses (108)Net assets (62)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $755k to $596k (−21%).

$755k
$596k
$551k
$469k
2021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$519k
’21
−$158k
’22
−$43k
’23
−$83k
’24
20
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Lee Spiller

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

2021202220232024
Listed4444
Joined·+0+0+0
No longer listed·000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $10k → $538.

Funder
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'26*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
1

3 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 2 of 3 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 79% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN.

79%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 30%Fundraising 3%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

55%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN?
CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,735 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $12,735 in grants to CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUSTIN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Citizens Commission on Human Rights of Austin →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing