Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER

CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,796 to it, the largest being MOMS AGAINST POVERTY ($9,960). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$262k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$11k
Grants received
$204k
Net assets
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%

Against its field

CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 22,771 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin64% · top quartile
Months of reserve25.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)20% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,771 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($74k) Expenses 100 ($57k) Net assets 100 ($101k)2018 Revenue 83 ($61k) Expenses 71 ($41k) Net assets 121 ($121k)2019 Revenue 76 ($56k) Expenses 67 ($38k) Net assets 138 ($139k)2020 Revenue 62 ($46k) Expenses 49 ($28k) Net assets 156 ($157k)2021 Revenue 178 ($131k) Expenses 183 ($104k) Net assets 183 ($184k)2022 Revenue 241 ($178k) Expenses 219 ($125k) Net assets 236 ($237k)2023 Revenue 149 ($110k) Expenses 546 ($310k) Net assets 37 ($37k)2024 Revenue 356 ($262k) Expenses 167 ($95k) Net assets 203 ($204k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (356)Expenses (167)Net assets (203)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

65% of CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
17
$21k
18
$18k
19
$18k
20
$27k
21
$53k
22
$200k
23
$167k
24
26
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $250 → $516.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER.

92%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 97%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER's grant income comes from California funders.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $286 arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
50%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER?
CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,796 to it, the largest being MOMS AGAINST POVERTY ($9,960). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $10,796 in grants to CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER?
MOMS AGAINST POVERTY is the largest funder on record, with $9,960 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHANGING LIVES TOGETHER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing