Oregon · Nonprofit
CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE
CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE (Oregon) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $186,128 to it, the largest being NAMI OREGON ($80,928). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE's revenue grew 15% between 2020 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,726 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Commonspirit Oregonlocal
- Ohio Peer Recovery Organizations Ohio-Proportfolio match
- McMillen Family Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 51% · 2021 94% · 2022 30% · 2023 15% · 2024 71%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $121k → $55k.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 67% · 2022 100% · 2023 73% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE's grant income comes from Oregon funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $35k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Commonspirit OregonlocalAZ · funds 23 organizations near you
- Ohio Peer Recovery Organizations Ohio-Proportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- McMillen Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Humphreys Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Northern Chautauqua Community Foundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Center for Community Recovery Innovations Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Northern Chautauqua Cportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Annmarie Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Civitan Club of Owensboro Kentucky Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Waddell Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trusteeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $608k on record.
- DISTRIBUTION TO CONTRACT SVC PROVIDER$236k
- DISTRIBUTION TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$209k
- DISTRIBUTION TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS$50k
- PAYMENTS TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$44k
- DISTRIBUTION TO INDIVIDUALS$35k
- OTHER DISTRIBUTION TO TAXABLE SUBRECIP$20k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
72% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
77%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE?
- CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE (Oregon) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $186,128 to it, the largest being NAMI OREGON ($80,928). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $186,128 in grants to CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE?
- NAMI OREGON is the largest funder on record, with $80,928 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHADWICK CLUBHOUSE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing