Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Oregon · Public charity

Nami Oregon

Through the education, support, advocacy and outreach programs, NAMI OREGON is dedicated to improving the quality of life of individuals living with mental illness, as well as their families and loved ones.

$26k
Granted FY2022
1
Itemized grants FY2022
1
Organizations funded FY2022
0%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$13k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$13,460
Largest grant, FY2022
$13,460
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$3.9M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 0% of the organizations Nami Oregon funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20221$13k0%
FY20213$153k33%
FY20203$111k67%
FY20191$7kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Health$143kHuman Services$141k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lifeboat Services$141,415246%
Chadwick Clubhouse$80,928126%
Nami Multnomah$34,50032%
Nami Lane County$27,50024%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Oregon Community …
The Oregon Community FoundationOR13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Nami Oregon with peer funders

About Nami Oregon

How much does Nami Oregon give?
Nami Oregon reported 1 itemized grants totaling $13,460, out of $26,465 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does Nami Oregon fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2022, its largest causes are Health (50%), Human Services (50%).
Who are Nami Oregon's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2022: Lifeboat Services ($141k), Chadwick Clubhouse ($81k), Nami Multnomah ($35k).
Does Nami Oregon fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Nami Oregon?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Oregon Community Foundation.
Where is Nami Oregon based?
Nami Oregon is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $15k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nami Oregon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home