Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

South Carolina · Nonprofit

CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION

CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION (South Carolina) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,060,777 to it, the largest being LKQ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,063,286). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$1.4M
Revenue FY2025
9
Funders on record
$2.1M
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
5/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 83%

Against its field

CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve26.4mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($934k) Expenses 100 ($798k) Net assets 100 ($890k)2018 Revenue 89 ($829k) Expenses 100 ($800k) Net assets 103 ($919k)2019 Revenue 108 ($1.0M) Expenses 112 ($895k) Net assets 116 ($1.0M)2020 Revenue 105 ($982k) Expenses 122 ($974k) Net assets 103 ($913k)2021 Revenue 108 ($1.0M) Expenses 127 ($1.0M) Net assets 102 ($910k)2022 Revenue 110 ($1.0M) Expenses 123 ($984k) Net assets 107 ($953k)2023 Revenue 140 ($1.3M) Expenses 128 ($1.0M) Net assets 140 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 121 ($1.1M) Expenses 144 ($1.1M) Net assets 138 ($1.2M)2025 Revenue 153 ($1.4M) Expenses 157 ($1.3M) Net assets 157 ($1.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (153)Expenses (157)Net assets (157)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $99k → $636k.

1 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

57% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION.

52%
largest funder
81%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 0% · 2018 100% · 2019 51% · 2020 59% · 2021 56% · 2022 63% · 2023 83%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

52% of CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $997k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside South Carolina, across 4 states.

NH
IL
NV
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
20
21
22
23
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION?
CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION (South Carolina) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,060,777 to it, the largest being LKQ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,063,286). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $2,060,777 in grants to CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION?
LKQ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,063,286 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP ADMINISTRATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing