Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
CAMP FIRE TAYANOKA (Ohio) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $107,067 in grants to it, the largest being United Way Services of Northern ($60,340). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CAMP FIRE TAYANOKA has grown faster than half of the 4,505 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,505 youth development nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$14k from 2 funders in 2024, up from $15k and 2 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of CAMP FIRE TAYANOKA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CAMP FIRE TAYANOKA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 52% · 2019 54% · 2020 57% · 2021 60% · 2022 60% · 2024 61% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
CAMP FIRE TAYANOKA is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
93%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing