How much did MARY GK FOX FOUNDATION 15-5006007 grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of MARY GK FOX FOUNDATION 15-5006007’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

summer programming

2019

greeneville greenebank

2020

greeneville greenebank

2021

greeneville greeneeducation

2022

requestscoutseducationgreeneville

2023

requestscoutseducationgreeneville

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k23 grants · $62k
$10k–50k7 grants · $118k

$3,500

Median grant

States reached

$4.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$35,000
TUSCULUM COLLEGE$20,000
NISWONGER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$20,000
ADVENTIST COMMUNITY$12,500
GREENEVILLE THEATRE GUILD$10,000
GREENEVILLE-GREENE COUNTY$10,000
YMCA OF GREENE COUNTY$10,000
GEORGE CLEM MULTICULTURAL$7,500
TABERNACLE MISSION SOUP KITCHEN$5,000
CANUP OF GREENE COUNTY$5,000
GREENEVILLE EMERGENCY$5,000
GREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NE TN$5,000
GREENE COUNTY FIREWOOD MINISTRY$4,000
GREENE LOCAL EDU ADVANCE FDN$3,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 35% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.3M · 42 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

42 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.3M

$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%

Still filing today

24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +363% · 89% of their budget
GC
GREENE COUNTY FIREWOOD MINISTRY
7× · 2018–2024 · $34k · revenue +21%
BH
BALLAD HEALTH FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +190%

Funded once

GC
GREENEVILLE-GREENE COUNTY COMMUNITY
one grant, 2018 · $20k
LT
LITTLE THEATRE OF GREENEV
one grant, 2017 · $10k
SJ
SAINT JAMES EPISCOPAL
one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Boys and Girls Club of Greeneville & Greene County

The Boys Girls Club of Greeneville/Greene County served over 2,000 youth through programs, activities, and community events in 2019. The club offers a professional staff who provide positive role models and mentors.

Human Services

Blue Ridge Council Boy Scouts of

The executive board of blue ridge council, inc., boy scouts of america 551, has approved the creation and establishment of the boy scout trust fund, for the benefit of scouting in the territory covered by the local council charter, for the…

—

Boy Scouts of America

To provide a values-based youth program based on precepts in the scout oath and law.

—

Greensboro College

An academic and social community that unites the liberal arts and Judeo-Christian values.

Education

Boys & Girls Clubs of Gordon

To enable all young people, especially those who need b&gc most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development

Boys & Girls Clubs

To enable youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development

Girl Scouts of South Carolina -

In girl scouts, girls grow into confident, courageous, and resilient individuals through hands-on activities and meaningful experiences. they develop essential life skills, strong values, a sense of social responsibility, and a belief in…

Youth Development

Boys & Girls Club of Gloucester

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development

Boys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development

Boys and Girls Village Inc

Boys and girls village serves children and families in at-risk situations by strengthening their ability to succeed in life.

Human Services

Greater Wyoming Council of the Bsa

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the Boy Scouts of America and in accordance with the Congressional Charter, Bylaws, and Rules and regulations of the Boy Scouts of…

—

Blue Ridge Council Inc

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of Tri-Cities and the most unlike its peers is Rural Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/14

Grantees still filing

6/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$809,785Youth Development$213,000Education$205,000Human Services$57,000Arts & Culture$40,000Health$16,480International$10,250Environment$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Tennessee FoundationTN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Tennessee Foundation · John M and Arnold S Jones Family Fd · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MARY GK FOX FOUNDATION 15-5006007 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 621843718 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 89% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007?

Find your warmest path to Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MARY GK FOX FOUNDATION 15-5006007

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007?

More from the funding graph

MARY GK FOX FOUNDATION 15-5006007

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007?

More from the funding graph