· Private foundation
Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $50,000 |
| TUSCULUM COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| NISWONGER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,500 |
| GREENEVILLE THEATER GUILD | $10,000 |
| YMCA OF GREENE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| GREENEVILLE GREENE CO HISTORY | $9,210 |
| TABERNACLE MISSION SOUP KITCHEN | $6,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| GREENE COUNTY FIREWOOD MINISTRY | $5,000 |
| GREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION | $4,500 |
| GREENE LOCAL EDU ADVANCE FDN | $3,500 |
| KARIS HEART FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| GREENE COUNTY TENNIS ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| GIFTS FOR KIDS | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
44 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTY8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +2%
- GCGREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +29%
- GCGREENE COUNTY FIREWOOD MINISTRY8× · 2018–2025 · $39k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- GCGREENEVILLE-GREENE COUNTY COMMUNITYone grant, 2018 · $20k
- LTLITTLE THEATRE OF GREENEVone grant, 2017 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fire and rescue services
Provide fire & rescue services to the local and surrounding community
Fire and emergency response to granville twp.
Provide fire protection
Volunteer fire department
Community volunteer fire deparment
Emergency medical services
Medical First Responder Volunteer rural Department
Local fire company
Fire and Rescue Services
Volunteer Fire Service
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Greene County and the most unlike its peers is Greene County Imagination Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TUSCULUM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GREENEVILLE THEATRE GUILD ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY FIREWOOD MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds CENTRA20040L BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Gifts for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds BALLAD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Rural Resources ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Baileyton Community Chest ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Tennessee Foundation · John M and Arnold S Jones Family Fd · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007?
Find your warmest path to Mary Gk Fox Foundation 15-5006007 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.