Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

BIOMED SA

BIOMED SA (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,000 to it, the largest being Southwest Research Institute ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$658k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$16k
Grants received
$805k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Against its field

BIOMED SA's revenue grew 35% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,946 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($487k) Expenses 100 ($465k) Net assets 100 ($79k)2018 Revenue 106 ($517k) Expenses 104 ($482k) Net assets 145 ($114k)2019 Revenue 82 ($400k) Expenses 83 ($384k) Net assets 166 ($131k)2020 Revenue 110 ($538k) Expenses 72 ($333k) Net assets 426 ($335k)2021 Revenue 107 ($523k) Expenses 89 ($412k) Net assets 568 ($447k)2022 Revenue 164 ($798k) Expenses 112 ($520k) Net assets 920 ($724k)2023 Revenue 164 ($799k) Expenses 148 ($685k) Net assets 1078 ($848k)2024 Revenue 135 ($658k) Expenses 152 ($706k) Net assets 1023 ($805k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (135)Expenses (152)Net assets (1023)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 21% · 2018 19% · 2019 25% · 2020 37% · 2021 27% · 2022 13% · 2023 13% · 2024 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

86% of BIOMED SA’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (62% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,403 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$22k
17
$36k
18
$16k
19
$204k
20
$112k
21
$278k
22
$114k
23
$48k
24
1.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $10k → $6k.

Funder
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1

Left out of every figure on this page: $8k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Texas Research and Technology Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money BIOMED SA raised.

From the IRS filings of BIOMED SA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BIOMED SA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BIOMED SA.

63%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of BIOMED SA's grant income comes from Texas funders.

TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

22
23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding BIOMED SA receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $105k on record.

Federal$105k
grants $0contracts $105k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Defense$105k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like BIOMED SA

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 13%Fundraising 6%

Governance

28
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

88%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BIOMED SA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BIOMED SA?
BIOMED SA (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,000 to it, the largest being Southwest Research Institute ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BIOMED SA have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $16,000 in grants to BIOMED SA.
Who is the largest funder of BIOMED SA?
Southwest Research Institute is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BIOMED SA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing