Texas · Nonprofit
BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY
BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $212,913 to it, the largest being CHILDS PLAY ($195,463). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,881 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,881 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324localportfolio match
- Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundationlocalportfolio match
- Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100localportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
1% of BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $65k → $7k.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 3 of 4 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 50% · 2019 100% · 2021 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324localportfolio matchTX · funds 63 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundationlocalportfolio matchTX · funds 82 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100localportfolio matchTX · funds 106 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Betty Stieren Kelso Foundationlocalportfolio matchTX · funds 100 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600localportfolio matchTX · funds 66 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Driven Brands Charitable Foundationshared fundersNC · backs 33 organizations that share your funders
- San Antonio Medical Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Gorman Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Southwest Research Instituteportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Daniel J Sullivan Family Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Norman Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The TND Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
72% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY?
- BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $212,913 to it, the largest being CHILDS PLAY ($195,463). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $212,913 in grants to BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY?
- CHILDS PLAY is the largest funder on record, with $195,463 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like BLUE BIRD AUXILIARY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing