Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER

BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $70,670 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($42,487). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$460k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$71k
Net assets
$199k
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Berkeley Herbal Center does

Mission

1-cultivates highly-trained clinical herbalists through rigorous training. 2-funds and staffs our low-cost community herbal clinic for accessible care 3-amplifies diverse herbal arts and supports local entrepreneurs.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. In 2023 we removed barriers to making clinic appointments, allowing us to serve a greater part of our community. Finally, we began partnering with other local herbal medicine schools and alumni to provide lower cost herbs and classes.

    $98,978 spent$102,623 earned by the program
    32% of program spending
  2. In 2023 we also launched our online clinical internship program, providing a key educational resource for our online students to be mentored in clinical practice.

    $154,891 spent$35,272 earned by the program
    50% of program spending
  3. In 2023 we improved our student intake process and took student surveys to crowd source ideas for how to improve our educational offerings, this led to record breaking enrollment numbers for 2023.

    $58,971 spent$338,634 earned by the program
    19% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $312,840.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($416k) Expenses 100 ($402k) Net assets 100 ($111k)2018 Revenue 129 ($537k) Expenses 122 ($492k) Net assets 141 ($156k)2019 Revenue 78 ($324k) Expenses 104 ($416k) Net assets 57 ($63k)2020 Revenue 96 ($400k) Expenses 97 ($391k) Net assets 179 ($199k)2021 Revenue 113 ($469k) Expenses 118 ($474k) Net assets 175 ($195k)2022 Revenue 132 ($549k) Expenses 142 ($572k) Net assets 154 ($171k)2023 Revenue 115 ($478k) Expenses 98 ($395k) Net assets 232 ($257k)2024 Revenue 111 ($460k) Expenses 129 ($519k) Net assets 179 ($199k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (111)Expenses (129)Net assets (179)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $138k to $324k (+135%).

$201k
$237k
$138k
$324k
$328k
$265k
$337k
$263k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

5% of BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$14k
’17
$45k
’18
−$93k
’19
$10k
’20
−$4k
’21
−$23k
’22
$82k
’23
−$59k
’24
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed888567118
Joined·+0+0+4+2+4+5+2
No longer listed·0071315
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $42k → $27.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 75% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER.

60%
largest funder
95%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

75% of BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $18k that is directly attributable, 83% of it comes from funders outside California, across 2 states.

OR
CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $53k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $71k to it.

Operating margin−13% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,812 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
83%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER?
BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $70,670 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($42,487). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $70,670 in grants to BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $42,487 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BERKELEY HERBAL CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Berkeley Herbal Center →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing