Skip to content

North Dakota · Nonprofit

BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE

BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE (North Dakota) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $344,978 to it, the largest being Tortuga Charitable Foundation ($290,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$114k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$345k
Net assets
$89k
3/7 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Badlands Conservation Alliance does

Mission

The Badlands Conservation Alliance is a voice for wild nd places

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Education of the organizations mission to preserve ecological integrity of public lands in north dakota.

    $41,355 spent
    95% of program spending
  2. With 25 years serving north dakota we are a respected non profit for scrappy, grassroots conservation work.

  3. We are a collaborative partner that works with local conservations with both state and federal agencies.

  4. All other expenses

    $2,233 spent
    5% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $43,588.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($89k) Expenses 100 ($49k) Net assets 100 ($63k)2019 Revenue 47 ($41k) Expenses 63 ($31k) Net assets 117 ($73k)2020 Revenue 61 ($54k) Expenses 113 ($56k) Net assets 115 ($72k)2021 Revenue 107 ($95k) Expenses 180 ($88k) Net assets 142 ($89k)2022 Revenue 42 ($37k) Expenses 108 ($53k) Net assets 200 ($126k)2023 Revenue 108 ($95k) Expenses 147 ($72k) Net assets 236 ($149k)2024 Revenue 107 ($95k) Expenses 266 ($131k) Net assets 179 ($113k)2025 Revenue 129 ($114k) Expenses 281 ($138k) Net assets 141 ($89k)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (129)Expenses (281)Net assets (141)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $89k to $126k (+41%).

$63k
$73k
$83k
$89k
$126k
$149k
$113k
$91k
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

98% of BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,639 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$39k
’18
$10k
’19
−$1k
’20
$6k
’21
−$16k
’22
$23k
’23
−$36k
’24
−$24k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $7k → $60k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 84% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

84%
largest funder
92%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 83% · 2023 83% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE draws 90% of its grant income from funders outside North Dakota, across 3 states in all.

MT
ND
NJ

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
North Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−21% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,606 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Dakota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

ND

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE?
BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE (North Dakota) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $344,978 to it, the largest being Tortuga Charitable Foundation ($290,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $344,978 in grants to BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE?
Tortuga Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $290,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BADLANDS CONSERVATION ALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Badlands Conservation Alliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing