Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs

Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,556,063 to it, the largest being The Chicago Community Trust ($5,250,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 94% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.5M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$5.6M
Net assets
$1.8M
2/4 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs does

Mission

The Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs mission is to improve the quality of life for migrant and seasonal farmworkers and their families by promoting self-sufficiency through employment and training opportunities, educational attainment, and health and safety.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. EPA Grant: To utilize existing farmworker service organizations within its membership to create a network of skilled educators on pesticide safety environmental standards.

    $349,904 spent$349,904 earned by the program
    54% of program spending
  2. Pesticide safety education to low-income farmworkers, public education projects, and Heat-Stress Prevention programs.

    $203,835 spent$203,835 earned by the program
    32% of program spending
  3. ATI is a year-long professional training and certification program for staff of AFOPs member organizations, which serve migrant and seasonal farmworkers.

    $91,192 spent$116,875 earned by the program
    14% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $644,931.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($852k)2018 Revenue 84 ($1.3M) Expenses 95 ($1.4M) Net assets 96 ($822k)2019 Revenue 95 ($1.5M) Expenses 98 ($1.4M) Net assets 111 ($949k)2020 Revenue 427 ($6.7M) Expenses 456 ($6.5M) Net assets 147 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 91 ($1.4M) Expenses 85 ($1.2M) Net assets 199 ($1.7M)2022 Revenue 92 ($1.4M) Expenses 98 ($1.4M) Net assets 179 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 90 ($1.4M) Expenses 106 ($1.5M) Net assets 197 ($1.7M)2024 Revenue 90 ($1.4M) Expenses 103 ($1.5M) Net assets 198 ($1.7M)2025 Revenue 95 ($1.5M) Expenses 99 ($1.4M) Net assets 207 ($1.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (95)Expenses (99)Net assets (207)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $1.2M to $1.7M (+39%).

$1.3M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.7M
$2.0M
$2.1M
$2.2M
$2.1M
$2.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 52% · 2018 43% · 2019 46% · 2020 11% · 2021 51% · 2022 50% · 2023 50% · 2024 44% · 2025 37%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$146k
’17
−$30k
’18
$97k
’19
$218k
’20
$209k
’21
$48k
’22
−$103k
’23
−$50k
’24
$74k
’25
3.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Daniel Sheehan

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed525350495050525254
Joined·+7+3+6+1+0+19+9+18
No longer listed·6670017916
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $150k → $23.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
2
1
1
1

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 94% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs.

94%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

94% of Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $306k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 2 states.

MI
SD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $5.6M on record.

Federal$5.6M
grants $5.6Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Environmental Protection Agency$3.8M
  • Department of Labor$1.8M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

46% of spending goes to programs.

Program 46%Management 54%Fundraising 0%

Governance

53
board members
98%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs?
Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,556,063 to it, the largest being The Chicago Community Trust ($5,250,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 94% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $5,556,063 in grants to Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs?
The Chicago Community Trust is the largest funder on record, with $5,250,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing