Loading…
Loading…
South Carolina · Nonprofit
APPLE BREAST CANCER WARRIOR (South Carolina) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,146 in grants to it, the largest being Network for Good ($5,146). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
APPLE BREAST CANCER WARRIOR runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 9,077 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,077 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2021
$1k from 2 funders in 2024, up from $5k and 1 in 2020.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 84% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of APPLE BREAST CANCER WARRIOR’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 2 of 3 funders by total. Association, not causation.
APPLE BREAST CANCER WARRIOR leans on a few funders — its largest provides 84% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
APPLE BREAST CANCER WARRIOR draws 84% of its grant income from funders outside South Carolina — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2021–2021), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing