Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League

Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $27,055 to it, the largest being DAFpay Network Inc ($9,710). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 64% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$312k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$27k
Net assets
$213k
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League does

Mission

The Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League offers recreational and competitive fastpitch softball for players in kindergarten through 9th grade. We are a nonprofit, all-volunteer league focused on providing a positive athletic experience for girls and gender-expansive youth, welcoming players of all skill levels from around the East Bay.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League ABGSL provides instruction, coaching, and equipment for learning and playing recreational and competitive softball for over 250 girls and gender-expansive youth. The League organizes teams, games, and provides clinics for players, coaches and umpires. ABGSL is an all volunteer organization. Our league operates on two basic principles: the first is sound basic skill development and active participation for all team members regardless of experience. The second is having fun so the players and their families have a good time and look forward to the practices and games. Our hope is that all the participants will enjoy being a part of the League, working together to learn and enjoy softball irrespective of which teams win or lose any particular week.

    $214,175 spent$171,546 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $214,175.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($192k) Expenses 100 ($189k) Net assets 100 ($139k)2018 Revenue 79 ($152k) Expenses 65 ($122k) Net assets 110 ($153k)2019 Revenue 70 ($135k) Expenses 80 ($151k) Net assets 98 ($136k)2020 Revenue 23 ($45k) Expenses 30 ($57k) Net assets 90 ($125k)2021 Revenue 50 ($96k) Expenses 46 ($86k) Net assets 98 ($136k)2022 Revenue 94 ($181k) Expenses 95 ($180k) Net assets 99 ($137k)2023 Revenue 110 ($211k) Expenses 114 ($215k) Net assets 96 ($133k)2024 Revenue 120 ($231k) Expenses 128 ($242k) Net assets 90 ($125k)2025 Revenue 162 ($312k) Expenses 119 ($224k) Net assets 153 ($213k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (162)Expenses (119)Net assets (153)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $126k to $217k (+72%).

$139k
$153k
$140k
$126k
$137k
$139k
$135k
$126k
$217k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$3k
’17
$30k
’18
−$16k
’19
−$12k
’20
$10k
’21
$1k
’22
−$4k
’23
−$11k
’24
$88k
’25
12
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202320242025
Listed292525
Joined·+8+7
No longer listed·127
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $39 → $42.

4 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 64% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League leans on a few funders — its largest provides 36% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League.

36%
largest funder
80%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

64% of Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $10k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 1 state.

IA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $17k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 4%Fundraising 0%

Governance

19
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League?
Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $27,055 to it, the largest being DAFpay Network Inc ($9,710). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 64% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $27,055 in grants to Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League?
DAFpay Network Inc is the largest funder on record, with $9,710 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Albany Berkeley Girls Softball League →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing