Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ABIDING IN THE VINE

ABIDING IN THE VINE (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $22,850 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($19,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 87% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2022
$90k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$23k
Net assets
$0
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Abiding in the Vine does

Mission

The organization's mission is to assist pastors, church staff, seminarians, professors, missionaries, and ministry leaders who hunger and thirst for growth in intimacy with god by offering contemplative retreats, spiritual direction, staff development, and uniquely designed spiritual formation opportunities.

As stated on its FY2022 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Spiritual formation team building: the intentional spiritual formation focus transformed the culture of the staff, as well as enhanced each staff member's relationship with god and relationships with one another.

    $76,603 spentof which $10,783 as grants
    54% of program spending
  2. Spiritual direction: spiritual direction is a one-on-one relationship that helps the individual become aware of the movements, invitations, and promptings of god in their life.

    $33,494 spent
    24% of program spending
  3. Retreats: retreats for christian leaders focused on creative and inspiring nourishment for the whole person mentally, spiritually, physically, emotionally, and relationally.

    $24,396 spent
    17% of program spending
  4. Leadership program: leadership promotion through christian spiritual formation involves the internal transformation of an individual into christ-likeness.

    $6,749 spent
    5% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2022 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $141,242.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($152k) Expenses 100 ($177k) Net assets 100 ($124k)2021 Revenue 82 ($124k) Expenses 90 ($159k) Net assets 72 ($89k)2022 Revenue 59 ($90k) Expenses 101 ($179k) Net assets 0 ($0)
202020212022
Revenue (59)Expenses (101)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $92k to $0 (−100%).

$124k
$92k
$0
202020212022
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

−$25k
’20
−$34k
’21
−$89k
’22
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $350 → $6k.

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 87% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ABIDING IN THE VINE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ABIDING IN THE VINE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

87% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ABIDING IN THE VINE.

83%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 65% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

87% of ABIDING IN THE VINE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $3k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 1 state.

DE

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like ABIDING IN THE VINE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

92%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ABIDING IN THE VINE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ABIDING IN THE VINE?
ABIDING IN THE VINE (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $22,850 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($19,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 87% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ABIDING IN THE VINE have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $22,850 in grants to ABIDING IN THE VINE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ABIDING IN THE VINE?
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC is the largest funder on record, with $19,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ABIDING IN THE VINE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Abiding in the Vine →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2020–2022), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing