Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Zolla Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$490k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$2.1MHuman Services$215kArts & Culture$170kHealth$127kRecreation & Sports$80kEnvironment$63kEmployment$58kPublic Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $277k
$18,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY$90,000
DETERMINED TO SUCCEED (DTS)$77,000
DETERMINED TO SUCCEED (DTS)$60,000
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE (FRAN&MAR)$50,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION (LAPHILAR)$30,000
Individual grant recipient$28,000
ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE)$27,000
MARINES CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION (MARINES)$20,000
AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE (AMCS)$18,000
HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS (HAPPY)$18,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR (COALITION)$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES (PPLA)$10,000
LA OPERA (LAOPERA)$10,000
PALI HIGH BOOSTER CLUB$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $5k → 22%GRIEFHAVEN: $5k → 14%GRIEFHAVEN: $5k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $48k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $44k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $28k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $27k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $27k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $15k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $12k → 14%ONE VOICE (ONEVOICE): $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 17 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$2.7M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+10%

Still filing today

35%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +141%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue +29%
  • PC
    PALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $14k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • VR
    VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +35%
  • SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • JS
    JVS SOCALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership for Los Angeles Schools

We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…

Education
2
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
3
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
4
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

7
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
8
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
9
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
10
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

11
The California Education Partners

California education partners seeds and grows collaborations among california's school systems, so that they innovate, improve, and build internal capacity as learning organizations in order to close gaps and lead high performing,…

Education
12
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project and the most unlike its peers is The Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DETERMINED TO SUCCEED (DTS) — $1,141,500 · OtherDETERMINED TO SUCCEED (DTS)BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY (BUCKNELL) — $255,000 · OtherBUCKNELL UNIVERSITY (BUCKNELL)Individual grant recipient — $252,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE (FRAN&MAR) — $225,000 · OtherFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE (FRAN&MAR)+10 more — $377,029 · Other+10 moreOne Voice — $205,000 · Human ServicesThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE — $90,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $37,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $115,000 · Arts & CultureBucknell University — $90,000 · EducationPALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $14,000 · EducationJVS SOCAL — $5,000 · EmploymentHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEPEOPLE INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $1,000 · Environment
Other$2,250,529Human Services$220,000Health$127,000Arts & Culture$115,000Education$104,000Employment$5,000Youth Development$2,000Environment$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOne Voice — $205,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE — $90,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJVS SOCAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds One Voice
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Bucknell University
  • Who funds AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE
  • Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds PALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds The Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds JVS SOCAL
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zolla Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zolla Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Zolla Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph