Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zimmerman Heimbach Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2018
14
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$50kArts & Culture$45kHuman Services$24kReligion$20kHousing & Shelter$12kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2018 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$821k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Service Source Fd$10,000
The Citadel Foundation$10,000
Morris Arboretum$10,000
Central Moravian Church$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WLVT-TV Public TV$5,000
New Bethany Ministries$5,000
Elizabethtown College$5,000
Chamber Music Society$5,000
Victory House$5,000
Bethlehem Special Olympics$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Allentown Rescue Mission$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 17% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Service Source Fd: $10k → 10%Elizabethtown College: $5k → 9%Fred's Footsteps: $2k → 10%WLVT-TV Public TV: $5k → 11%Historic Bethlehem Partnership: $25k → 11%Morris Arboretum: $10k → 22%The Citadel Foundation: $10k → 12%Bethlehem Special Olympics: $3k → 14%Service Source Fd: $10k → 10%Elizabethtown College: $5k → 9%WLVT-TV Public TV: $5k → 11%Bach Choir: $10k → 11%Morris Arboretum: $10k → 22%The Citadel Foundation: $10k → 12%Special Olympics: $3k → 14%Victory House: $5k → 11%Central Moravian Church: $10k → 11%Greater Philadelphia Chamber: $2k → 22%Victory House: $5k → 11%Bach Choir: $10k → 11%Greater Philadelphia Chamber: $2k → 22%New Bethany Ministries: $5k → 11%Central Moravian Church: $10k → 11%Covenant House Pennsylvania: $2k → 22%New Bethany Ministries: $5k → 11%Chamber Music Society: $5k → 11%Chamber Music Society: $5k → 11%Kirkland Village: $2k → 11%Kirkland Village: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 12 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$139k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+546%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CENTRAL MORAVIAN CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k
  • SS
    Service Source Fd
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k

Funded once

  • HB
    HISTORIC BETHLEHEM MUSEUMS AND SITESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +546%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +44%
  • CH
    Covenant House Pennsylvania
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL MORAVIAN CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherCENTRAL MORAVIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientService Source Fd: $20,000 · OtherService Source FdWLVT-TV Public TV: $10,000 · OtherWLVT-TV Public TVNEW BETHANY INC: $10,000 · OtherNEW BETHANY INCVictory House: $10,000 · OtherVictory HouseChamber Music Society: $10,000 · OtherChamber Music SocietyIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+4 more: $10,000 · Other+4 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…THE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationTHE CITADEL FOUNDATIONELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGEHISTORIC BETHLEHEM MUSEUMS AND SITES: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC BETHL…SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$114,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$25,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHISTORIC BETHLEHEM MUSEUMS AND SITES: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BETHANY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HISTORIC BETHLEHEM MUSEUMS AND SITES ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW BETHANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zimmerman Heimbach Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zimmerman Heimbach Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zimmerman Heimbach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph