· Private foundation
Zimmel Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $292k
- $250k+2 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY-REGENTS STEM SCHOLARS PROGRAM | $400,000 |
| EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE COUNTY | $250,000 |
| NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES | $150,000 |
| AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA | $81,943 |
| EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| THE FAMILY LEARNING CENTER | $30,000 |
| YAMPA RIVER BOTANIC PARK | $5,110 |
| CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC | $5,000 |
| EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| PROTECT OUR WINTERS | $3,172 |
| CLEARWATER CAMP FOUNDATION | $1,070 |
| MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION | $1,062 |
| VAIL SYMPOSIUM | $1,000 |
| THE COLORADO TRAIL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY4× · 2017–2020 · $1.2M · revenue +47%
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC5× · 2018–2024 · $500k · revenue +29%- EFEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY2× · 2024–2025 · $300k · revenue +60%
Funded once
DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -44%- CBCHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADEMYone grant, 2019 · $125k
- SCSTANWICH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Learning Disabilities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vail Symposium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF EAGLE CNTY ↗
- Who funds NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Center for the Arts Evergreen Inc ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
- Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BETH-EL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds Bootstraps Inc ↗
- Who funds RESILIENCE 1220 INC ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds CHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Clearwater Camp Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MIANUS RIVER GORGE INC ↗
- Who funds THEATERWORKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · S & L Marx Foundation · Lone Pine Foundation Inc · The Tudor Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zimmel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
- Family & Children's Agency Inc — 47% of income from government
- Pathways Inc — 45% of income from government
- Liberation Programs Inc — 24% of income from government
- Beth-El Center Inc — 23% of income from government
- Theaterworks Inc — 3% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Pilobolus Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mcdaniel College Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.