Skip to content
Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc

To raise funds to support the needy who dedicate their lives to the study of talmud and jewish law.

$410k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$408kEducation$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $208,218, the rows itemized in this filing. The $409,942 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $201,724 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$126k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BEIS MEDRASH AVREICHEM INC$50,000
KHZY - CONGREGATION GATE OF MERCY$27,000
YESHIVA KEREN ORAH$24,010
YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF AIRMONT$20,000
KEREN OLAM HATORAH$18,000
YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD INC$12,860
YESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM$10,800
ZICHRON DOV BER$10,000
BNOS DEVORAH$10,000
BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV$8,348
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA$6,000
YESHIVA OF HAMILTON$6,000
BAIS SHAINDEL$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF AIRMONT: $20k → 14%AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $6k → 17%YESHIVA OF HAMILTON: $6k → 11%YESHIVA NACHLAS ABBA: $107k → 11%ZICHRON DOV BER: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION BEIS MEDRASH AVREICHEM INC: $50k → 11%ZICHRON DOV BER: $10k → 14%BMG: $36k → 11%ZICHRON DOV BER: $7k → 14%KHZY - CONGREGATION GATE OF MERCY: $31k → 11%KHZY - CONGREGATION GATE OF MERCY: $31k → 11%KHZY - CONGREGATION GATE OF MERCY: $27k → 11%BMG: $27k → 11%YESHIVA KEREN ORAH: $24k → 11%YESHIVA BIRCHAS CHAIM: $19k → 11%BNOS DEVORAH: $14k → 11%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD INC: $13k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM: $11k → 11%BNOS DEVORAH: $10k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV: $9k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV: $8k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM: $8k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV: $8k → 11%YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD INC: $7k → 11%YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $6k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM: $5k → 11%BAIS SHAINDEL: $5k → 11%BAIS SHAINDEL: $5k → 11%KEREN OLAM HATORAH: $18k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $49k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$49k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GRANTS ARE MADE TO SUPPORT THE NEEDY WHO DEDICATE THEIR LIVES TO THE STUDY OF TALMUD AND JEWISH LAW.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 7 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$253k
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
+13%

Still filing today

43%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $90k
  • BM
    BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $63k · revenue +2%
  • BM
    BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • YM
    YESHIVAS MEOR HATALMUD OF LAKEWOOD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $107k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $19k
  • CB
    CONG BNOS DEVORAH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAS MEOR HATALMUD OF LAKEWOOD INC: $106,500 · OtherYESHIVAS MEOR HATALMUD OF LAKEWOOD INCCONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY: $89,800 · OtherCONGREGATION GATES OF MERCYCONGREGATION BEIS MEDRASH AVREICHIM INC: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BEIS MEDRASH AVREICHIM INCBAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV: $24,948 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOVYESHIVA TORAS MENACHEM: $24,400 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS MENACHEMYESHIVA KEREN ORAH: $24,010 · OtherYESHIVA KEREN ORAHYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF AIRMONT: $20,000 · OtherMOSDOS ZICHRON EREZ INC: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherKEREN OLAM HATORAH INC: $18,000 · Other+5 more: $42,800 · Other+5 moreBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC: $63,000 · EducationBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA O…YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $20,320 · EducationYESHIVA SHAAR HATALMU…BAIS SHAINDEL: $10,400 · EducationBAIS SHAINDELYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $6,400 · EducationYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH …
Other$439,458Education$100,120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC: $63,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD: $20,320 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAIS SHAINDEL: $10,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAAR HATALMUD ↗
  • Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundDonors Fund IncJewish Community Foun…Jewish Communal FundRegina Goldwasser Fou…Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh …Senior Community Serv…Toras Chesed IncNational Society for …National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
The Ojc FundNY23.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc · Senior Community Services Inc · Toras Chesed Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc?

Find your warmest path to Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zichron Chasdei Eliezer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home