· Private foundation
Zia & Rabia Bhatti Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $950k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND | $200,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED | $200,000 |
| PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND | $200,000 |
| THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA | $150,000 |
| ISLAMIC RELIEF USA | $100,000 |
| I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC | $100,000 |
| I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC | $40,000 |
| HEAL PALESTINE INC | $20,000 |
| ISLAMIC CULTURAL CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGO | $20,000 |
| CAIR-CHICAGO | $20,000 |
| I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC | $20,000 |
| ISLAMIC RELIEF USA | $20,000 |
| ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC | $10,000 |
| ISLAMIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 52% of Zia & Rabia Bhatti Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.
International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application
Providing clean water to poor people living in Pakistan.
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
Imana fosters health promotion, disease prevention, and health maintenance in communities around the world through direct patient care, health programs, and advocacy.
Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
To support charitable projects and programs in Pakistan.
The foundation fosters and promote the development, knowledge and advancement of education of the teachings of the islamic religion throughout the world
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I-Care Fund America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Island of Hope Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CAIR-CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
- Who funds SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Islamic Scholarship Fund ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds UMMA ↗
- Who funds YAQEEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH ASIA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds First Look Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ISLAND OF HOPE NFP ↗
- Who funds Humanity United for Development and Advancement Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Verizon Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Islamic Food & Nutrition Council of America · Baxter International Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zia & Rabia Bhatti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.