Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zeman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$584kRecreation & Sports$346kHealth$345kHuman Services$110kFood & Nutrition$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kYouth Development$7kAnimals$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$865k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAWMSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$110,000
MAKE A WISH ILLINOIS$20,000
WINGS$20,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$15,000
WELLNESS HOUSE$15,000
OLE MISS ATHLETICS FOUNDATION$10,000
CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AB FOR AUTISM INC: $2k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $10k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $10k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $10k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $10k → 14%HELPING HAND CENTER: $5k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $10k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$1.4M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

65%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +12%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +43%
  • WH
    Wellness House
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • WA
    WEST ALLIS REC CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • PD
    PLEASANT DALE PARK DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • KD
    KEN DUKE AND FRIENDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ken Duke and Friends Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAWMSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $240,000 · OtherWAWMSD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONWEST ALLIS RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $210,000 · OtherWEST ALLIS RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENTMONTINI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $163,700 · OtherMONTINI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $140,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INCWAWMSD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $120,000 · OtherWAWMSD EDUCATION FOUNDATIONWINGS: $110,000 · OtherWINGSWEST ALLIS REC CENTER: $70,000 · OtherWEST ALLIS REC CENTER+6 more: $33,310 · OtherWellness House: $95,000 · HealthWellness H…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…+1 more: $3,000 · HealthNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $105,000 · Food & NutritionColumbia College Chicago: $30,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationOLE MISS ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationHELPING HAND CENTER: $45,000 · Human ServicesCLEARBROOK: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesPLEASANT DALE PARKS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $27,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,087,010Health$143,000Food & Nutrition$105,000Education$70,500Human Services$62,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Arts & Culture$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $140,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $105,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWellness House: $95,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND CENTER: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetColumbia College Chicago: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEN DUKE AND FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOLE MISS ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREGMAN CARES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLYONS TOWNSHIP HOCKEY CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Columbia College Chicago ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANT DALE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds KEN DUKE AND FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLE MISS ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANNY DID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREGMAN CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds LYONS TOWNSHIP HOCKEY CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zeman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zeman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zeman Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Zeman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zeman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph