Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zarks Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$114kPhilanthropy$100kAnimals$25kPublic Benefit$7kEducation$4kHuman Services$4kHousing & Shelter$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$733k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION SHAAREY ISRAEL$14,867
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$13,460
MERRIFIELDS HORSE RESCUE AND RETIREMENT$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA$5,000
SOUTHERN TENNIS FOUNDATION$2,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA$2,000
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND$1,000
MACON CIVIC CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $3k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$219k · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$219k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+70%

Still filing today

30%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL
    5× · 2017–2024 · $55k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHA AREY ISRAEL INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $47k
  • MF
    MACON FEDERATION OF JEWISH CHARITIES
    4× · 2020–2023 · $46k

Funded once

  • MF
    MACON FEDERATION OF JEWISH
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • NS
    Next Step Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
3
Jewish Community Center of Southern Nevada Inc

To provide jewish educational, social, athletic and cultural programs to the community.

Unclassified
4
Hillel At Florida International University

Enrich the lives of jewish students

—
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
7
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
9
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
10
Jewish Federation of Cumberland Gloucester & Salem Counties

Advancement of the Jewish Community

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Life Foundation
—
12
Atlanta Jewish Life Foundation Inc

The atlanta jewish life foundation inc. was founded to promote community engagement and education of jewish life in the southeast. the foundation supports the local jewish newspaper which is a service to the jewish community and supports…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillels of Georgia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Macon Civic Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $55,460 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ISRAELCONGREGATION SHA AREY ISRAEL INC: $46,997 · OtherCONGREGATION SHA AREY ISRAEL INCMACON FEDERATION OF JEWISH CHARITIES: $46,000 · OtherMACON FEDERATION OF JEWISH CHARITIESMERRIFIELDS HORSE RESCUE AND RETIREMENT: $25,000 · OtherMERRIFIELDS HORSE RESCUE AND RETIREMENTMACON FEDERATION OF JEWISH: $15,500 · OtherMACON FEDERATION OF JEWISHUNITED WAY: $15,000 · OtherUNITED WAYHillels of Georgia Inc: $12,000 · Other+10 more: $31,944 · Other+10 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $16,400 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyNext Step Ministries Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC: $900 · International
Other$247,901Philanthropy$18,400Human Services$2,500International$1,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $16,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHillels of Georgia Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMACON CIVIC CLUB INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNext Step Ministries Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Hillels of Georgia Inc ↗
  • Who funds MACON CIVIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Next Step Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zarks Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zarks Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zarks Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Zarks Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zarks Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph