Skip to content

· Private foundation

Z-Gi Giving Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE TAHOE INC$2,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$1,000
SKIDUCK SKIING FOR DISABLED AND UNDERPRIVILEGED$1,000
THE ZAWADISHA FUND$1,000
PACIFIC BEACH COALITION$750
BACK TO EARTH NATURE CONNECTION INC$750
HEADWATERS SCIENCE INSTITUTE$500
SPIRIT OF THE WIND$500
BAY AREA WOMENS AND CHILDRENS CENTER$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BAY AREA WOMENS AND CHILDRENS CENTER: $500 → 10%SKIDUCK SKIING FOR DISABLED AND UNDERPRIVILEGED: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sierra Streams Institute

To promote community stewardship and advance scientific knowledge of watersheds through reserarch, monitoring and education for the benefit of the Sierra Nevada region and beyond.

Environment
2
Sierra Watershed Education Partnerships

Sierra Watershed Education Partnerships (SWEP) promotes environmental stewardship by connecting students to their community and local environment through comprehensive watershed education and service learning projects.

Environment
3
Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc

Our mission: We rescue, rehabilitate, and release orphaned and injured wildlife and educate the community about the health and safety of our wildlife.

—
4
Wild Earth Society Incorporated

Wildlands Network works to reconnect, restore and rewild North America so that life-in all its diversity-can thrive.

Arts & Culture
5
LandPaths

LandPaths' mission is to foster a love of the land in Sonoma County. LandPaths creates ways for people to experience the beauty, understand the value, and assist in healing the land in their local communities.

Environment
6
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
7
BestStart Washington

BestStart Washington gives children their best start toward lifelong success and resilience by working to improve their physical health, emotional wellbeing and academic achievement. Founded and governed by pediatricians, BestStart…

Health
8
Tahoe Backcountry Alliance

The Tahoe Backcountry Alliance is the voice for the human-powered winter backcountry community in the Lake Tahoe area, advocating for and informing our community about critical issues affecting winter backcountry recreation in and around…

Environment
9
Environmental Volunteers Inc

Promote the understanding of and responsibility for the environment through hands-on science education.

Environment
10
The Wildlands Conservancy

The Wildlands Conservancy's dual mission is to preserve the beauty and biodiversity of the earth and to provide programs so that children may know the wonder and joy of nature.

Environment
11
Placer Nature Center

Educational

Environment
12
Wilderness Integration Project

To provide wilderness education through youth backcountry programs and community events centered around love for the natural world. We work to connect human hearts with the everyday wild through adventure, scientific inquiry, storytelling,…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Womens and Childrens Center; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $2,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TA…SKIDUCK SKIING FOR DISABLED AND UNDERPRIVILEGED CHILDREN AND OLDER: $1,000 · Human ServicesSKIDUCK SKIING FOR DI…Bay Area Womens and Childrens Center: $500 · Human ServicesBay Area Womens and C…THE ZAWADISHA FUND: $1,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ZAWADISHA …International Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 · InternationalInternational …Pacific Beach Coalition: $750 · EnvironmentPacific Be…Back to Earth Nature Connection: $750 · Arts & CultureBack to Ea…HEADWATERS SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $500 · Science & TechSPIRIT OF THE WIND: $500 · Other
Animals$2,000Human Services$1,500Community Improvement$1,000International$1,000Environment$750Arts & Culture$750Science & Tech$500Other$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBack to Earth Nature Connection: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBay Area Womens and Childrens Center: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEADWATERS SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Z-Gi Giving Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Z-Gi Giving Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Z-Gi Giving Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Z-Gi Giving Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Z-Gi Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph