Skip to content
YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley

Ywca promotes peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$5.4MCrime & Legal$1.6MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$1.2MEducation$191kEmployment$30k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $228,891, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,409,694 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,180,803 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$21,384
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA THIRD STREET INC$200,307
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA$21,384
BILL WILSON CENTER$7,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BILL WILSON CENTER: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 6 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$9.5M
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
0%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +112%
  • COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +63%
  • M
    MAITRI
    2× · 2020–2021 · $60k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CP
    CURATED PATHWAYS TO INNOVATION
    one grant, 2022 · $191k · revenue -90% · 71% of their budget
  • BM
    BLOOM MARIN
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue 0% · 31% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca Golden Gate Silicon Valley

Ywca promotes peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
2
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
3
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
4
The Ywca Monterey County

The ywca monterey county is committed to eliminating racism. with thedevelopment of the monterey county human trafficking task force, theorganization has created a collaborative effort among law enforcement,prosecutors, substance use…

Human Services
5
South Asian Helpline and Referral Agency

Provide referral help line, couseling, transitional home and supportto victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
6
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
7
Sauti Yetu Center for African Women Inc

Sauti yetu is dedicated in mobilizing women to improve the quality of their lives, strengthen their families and develop their communities.

Civil Rights
8
Brighter Tomorrows Inc

Provides services to domestic violence victims which include shelter, transitional housing and other intensive supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
9
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
10
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
11
Community Forward Sf Inc

Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…

Health
12
Steps to End Domestic Violence Inc

Assist in transition to a safe, independent life for those who have been affected physically, sexually, emotionally, or economically by domestic abuse and to promote a culture that fosters justice, equity and safety.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bill Wilson Center; the most unlike its peers is Curated Pathways to Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA THIRD STREET INC: $5,375,609 · Housing & ShelterYWCA THIRD STREET INCTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $2,034,072 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR…COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: $1,932,724 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR…+2 more: $81,428 · OtherCURATED PATHWAYS TO INNOVATION: $191,294 · EducationMAITRI: $60,453 · Human ServicesBILL WILSON CENTER: $7,200 · Human ServicesSTEP FORWARD FOUNDATION: $44,142 · Crime & Legal
Housing & Shelter$5,375,609Health$2,034,072Other$2,014,152Education$191,294Human Services$67,653Crime & Legal$44,142

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA THIRD STREET INC: $5,375,609 over 5y, 98% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $2,034,072 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: $1,932,724 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCURATED PATHWAYS TO INNOVATION: $191,294 over 1y, 71% of budgetMAITRI: $60,453 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSTEP FORWARD FOUNDATION: $44,142 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBLOOM MARIN: $30,355 over 1y, 31% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Destination Home SV c…Sunlight GivingSilicon Valley Commun…Second Harvest of Sil…The Sobrato Family Fo…United Way of the Bay…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · The Sobrato Family Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home